mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FloodBrain: Flood Disaster Reporting by Web-based Retrieval Augmented Generation with an LLM

arXiv 2311.02597 ↗First posted 5 Nov 2023cs.AI cs.CLcited by 9

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Agentic RAG, agents and memory

Abstract (arXiv)

Fast disaster impact reporting is crucial in planning humanitarian assistance. Large Language Models (LLMs) are well known for their ability to write coherent text and fulfill a variety of tasks relevant to impact reporting, such as question answering or text summarization. However, LLMs are constrained by the knowledge within their training data and are prone to generating inaccurate, or "hallucinated", information. To address this, we introduce a sophisticated pipeline embodied in our tool FloodBrain (floodbrain.com), specialized in generating flood disaster impact reports by extracting and curating information from the web. Our pipeline assimilates information from web search results to produce detailed and accurate reports on flood events. We test different LLMs as backbones in our tool and compare their generated reports to human-written reports on different metrics. Similar to other studies, we find a notable correlation between the scores assigned by GPT-4 and the scores given by human evaluators when comparing our generated reports to human-authored ones. Additionally, we conduct an ablation study to test our single pipeline components and their relevancy for the final reports. With our tool, we aim to advance the use of LLMs for disaster impact reporting and reduce the time for coordination of humanitarian efforts in the wake of flood disasters.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agentic RAG, agents and memory, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 8 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2023.

Builds on

8 of 17 references.

References · 8

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  3. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
  4. 2023The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn "B is A"cited by 399
  5. 2022Estimating the Carbon Footprint of BLOOM, a 176B Parameter Language Modelcited by 264
  6. 2023Challenges and Applications of Large Language Modelscited by 251
  7. 2023GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Modelscited by 174
  8. 2020Understanding the Extent to which Summarization Evaluation Metrics Measure the Information Quality of Summariescited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025A Large-Language-Model Framework for Automated Humanitarian Situation Reporting
  2. 2026DisastRAG: A Multi-Source Disaster Information Integration and Access System Based on Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models
  3. 2025FloodSQL-Bench: A Retrieval-Augmented Benchmark for Geospatially-Grounded Text-to-SQL
  4. 2026CrisiSense-RAG: Crisis Sensing Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Rapid Disaster Impact Assessment
  5. 2025LLMs as World Models: Data-Driven and Human-Centered Pre-Event Simulation for Disaster Impact Assessment
  6. 2026Can Large Language Models Revolutionize Survey Research? Experiments with Disaster Preparedness Responses
  7. 2026Training-free retrieval-augmented generation with reinforced reasoning for flood damage nowcasting
  8. 2025A RAG-Based Multi-Agent LLM System for Natural Hazard Resilience and Adaptation