Narrowing the Gap between Zero- and Few-shot Machine Translation by Matching Styles
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models trained primarily in a monolingual setting have demonstrated their ability to generalize to machine translation using zero- and few-shot examples with in-context learning. However, even though zero-shot translations are relatively good, there remains a discernible gap comparing their performance with the few-shot setting. In this paper, we investigate the factors contributing to this gap and find that this gap can largely be closed (for about 70%) by matching the writing styles of the target corpus. Additionally, we explore potential approaches to enhance zero-shot baselines without the need for parallel demonstration examples, providing valuable insights into how these methods contribute to improving translation metrics.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2023.
Builds on
15 of 30 references.
References · 15
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
- 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,312
- 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
- 2023How Good Are GPT Models at Machine Translation? A Comprehensive Evaluationcited by 348
- 2017Six Challenges for Neural Machine Translationcited by 335
- 2023Prompting Large Language Model for Machine Translation: A Case Studycited by 250
- 2023Is ChatGPT A Good Translator? Yes With GPT-4 As The Enginecited by 176
- 2020Deep Learning for Text Style Transfer: A Surveycited by 162
3 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
3 papers.