Explainable Authorship Identification in Cultural Heritage Applications: Analysis of a New Perspective
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While a substantial amount of work has recently been devoted to enhance the performance of computational Authorship Identification (AId) systems, little to no attention has been paid to endowing AId systems with the ability to explain the reasons behind their predictions. This lacking substantially hinders the practical employment of AId methodologies, since the predictions returned by such systems are hardly useful unless they are supported with suitable explanations. In this paper, we explore the applicability of existing general-purpose eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques to AId, with a special focus on explanations addressed to scholars working in cultural heritage. In particular, we assess the relative merits of three different types of XAI techniques (feature ranking, probing, factuals and counterfactual selection) on three different AId tasks (authorship attribution, authorship verification, same-authorship verification) by running experiments on real AId data. Our analysis shows that, while these techniques make important first steps towards explainable Authorship Identification, more work remains to be done in order to provide tools that can be profitably integrated in the workflows of scholars.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2023.
Builds on
22 of 78 references.
References · 22
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
- 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 876
- 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 640
- 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 636
- 2019Linguistic Knowledge and Transferability of Contextual Representationscited by 383
- 2020A Survey of the State of Explainable AI for Natural Language Processingcited by 206
- 2020Birds have four legs?! NumerSense: Probing Numerical Commonsense Knowledge of Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 110
- 2018Towards Explainable NLP: A Generative Explanation Framework for Text Classificationcited by 55
- 2020IROF: a low resource evaluation metric for explanation methodscited by 46
10 more
- 2021SelfExplain: A Self-Explaining Architecture for Neural Text Classifierscited by 44
- 2019Explainable Authorship Verification in Social Media via Attention-based Similarity Learningcited by 37
- 2019Human-grounded Evaluations of Explanation Methods for Text Classificationcited by 28
- 2020The Importance of Suppressing Domain Style in Authorship Analysiscited by 18
- 2019Assessing the Applicability of Authorship Verification Methodscited by 11
- 2017InterpNET: Neural Introspection for Interpretable Deep Learningcited by 5
- 2021Syllabic Quantity Patterns as Rhythmic Features for Latin Authorship Attributioncited by 5
- 2020MedLatinEpi and MedLatinLit: Two Datasets for the Computational Authorship Analysis of Medieval Latin Textscited by 4
- 2022Do Transformers Encode a Foundational Ontology? Probing Abstract Classes in Natural Languagecited by 3
- 2023Same or Different? Diff-Vectors for Authorship Analysiscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.