mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

InterpNET: Neural Introspection for Interpretable Deep Learning

arXiv 1710.09511 ↗First posted 26 Oct 2017stat.ML cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Humans are able to explain their reasoning. On the contrary, deep neural networks are not. This paper attempts to bridge this gap by introducing a new way to design interpretable neural networks for classification, inspired by physiological evidence of the human visual system's inner-workings. This paper proposes a neural network design paradigm, termed InterpNET, which can be combined with any existing classification architecture to generate natural language explanations of the classifications. The success of the module relies on the assumption that the network's computation and reasoning is represented in its internal layer activations. While in principle InterpNET could be applied to any existing classification architecture, it is evaluated via an image classification and explanation task. Experiments on a CUB bird classification and explanation dataset show qualitatively and quantitatively that the model is able to generate high-quality explanations. While the current state-of-the-art METEOR score on this dataset is 29.2, InterpNET achieves a much higher METEOR score of 37.9.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

5 papers.