mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

QFree: A Universal Value Function Factorization for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2311.00356 ↗First posted 1 Nov 2023cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Centralized training is widely utilized in the field of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) to assure the stability of training process. Once a joint policy is obtained, it is critical to design a value function factorization method to extract optimal decentralized policies for the agents, which needs to satisfy the individual-global-max (IGM) principle. While imposing additional limitations on the IGM function class can help to meet the requirement, it comes at the cost of restricting its application to more complex multi-agent environments. In this paper, we propose QFree, a universal value function factorization method for MARL. We start by developing mathematical equivalent conditions of the IGM principle based on the advantage function, which ensures that the principle holds without any compromise, removing the conservatism of conventional methods. We then establish a more expressive mixing network architecture that can fulfill the equivalent factorization. In particular, the novel loss function is developed by considering the equivalent conditions as regularization term during policy evaluation in the MARL algorithm. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed method is verified in a nonmonotonic matrix game scenario. Moreover, we show that QFree achieves the state-of-the-art performance in a general-purpose complex MARL benchmark environment, Starcraft Multi-Agent Challenge (SMAC).

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2023.

Builds on

17 of 39 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
  2. 2021The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Gamescited by 903
  3. 2015End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policiescited by 847
  4. 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 733
  5. 2019The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challengecited by 589
  6. 2019Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Selective Overview of Theories and Algorithmscited by 555
  7. 2020Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 475
  8. 2019QTRAN: Learning to Factorize with Transformation for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 372
  9. 2021MetaDrive: Composing Diverse Driving Scenarios for Generalizable Reinforcement Learningcited by 281
  10. 2020QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-Learningcited by 267
  11. 2018Actor-Attention-Critic for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 259
  12. 2020Weighted QMIX: Expanding Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 197
5 more
  1. 2015Multiagent Cooperation and Competition with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 180
  2. 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Agent Systems: A Review of Challenges, Solutions and Applicationscited by 122
  3. 2020Qatten: A General Framework for Cooperative Multiagent Reinforcement Learningcited by 81
  4. 2021Rethinking the Implementation Tricks and Monotonicity Constraint in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 68
  5. 2022Rethinking Individual Global Max in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 13

Built on by

Not cited yet.