Flooding Regularization for Stable Training of Generative Adversarial Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have shown remarkable performance in image generation. However, GAN training suffers from the problem of instability. One of the main approaches to address this problem is to modify the loss function, often using regularization terms in addition to changing the type of adversarial losses. This paper focuses on directly regularizing the adversarial loss function. We propose a method that applies flooding, an overfitting suppression method in supervised learning, to GANs to directly prevent the discriminator's loss from becoming excessively low. Flooding requires tuning the flood level, but when applied to GANs, we propose that the appropriate range of flood level settings is determined by the adversarial loss function, supported by theoretical analysis of GANs using the binary cross entropy loss. We experimentally verify that flooding stabilizes GAN training and can be combined with other stabilization techniques. We also show that by restricting the discriminator's loss to be no less than the flood level, the training proceeds stably even when the flood level is somewhat high.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2023.
Builds on
31 of 40 references.
References · 31
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,986
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2016Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 4,510
- 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,580
- 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
- 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,967
- 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,938
- 2018Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesiscited by 2,609
- 2017Improved Training of Wasserstein GANscited by 2,223
- 2014Conditional Generative Adversarial Netscited by 2,152
19 more
- 2015Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 2,048
- 2016Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Networkcited by 1,898
- 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,618
- 2017Adversarial Discriminative Domain Adaptationcited by 1,309
- 2019Semantic Image Synthesis with Spatially-Adaptive Normalizationcited by 1,295
- 2019StarGAN v2: Diverse Image Synthesis for Multiple Domainscited by 1,095
- 2016Least Squares Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,000
- 2018Self-Attention Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 809
- 2016StackGAN: Text to Photo-realistic Image Synthesis with Stacked Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 575
- 2017Geometric GANcited by 232
- 2017VEEGAN: Reducing Mode Collapse in GANs using Implicit Variational Learningcited by 199
- 2016Mode Regularized Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 123
- 2018Patch-Based Image Inpainting with Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 70
- 2017On the regularization of Wasserstein GANscited by 65
- 2020Do We Need Zero Training Loss After Achieving Zero Training Error?cited by 61
- 2020A Systematic Survey of Regularization and Normalization in GANscited by 27
- 2017On Convergence and Stability of GANscited by 17
- 2017On the Effects of Batch and Weight Normalization in Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 13
- 2018Mixture Density Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.