mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Graph Representation Learning for Infrared and Visible Image Fusion

arXiv 2311.00291 ↗First posted 1 Nov 2023cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Infrared and visible image fusion aims to extract complementary features to synthesize a single fused image. Many methods employ convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to extract local features due to its translation invariance and locality. However, CNNs fail to consider the image's non-local self-similarity (NLss), though it can expand the receptive field by pooling operations, it still inevitably leads to information loss. In addition, the transformer structure extracts long-range dependence by considering the correlativity among all image patches, leading to information redundancy of such transformer-based methods. However, graph representation is more flexible than grid (CNN) or sequence (transformer structure) representation to address irregular objects, and graph can also construct the relationships among the spatially repeatable details or texture with far-space distance. Therefore, to address the above issues, it is significant to convert images into the graph space and thus adopt graph convolutional networks (GCNs) to extract NLss. This is because the graph can provide a fine structure to aggregate features and propagate information across the nearest vertices without introducing redundant information. Concretely, we implement a cascaded NLss extraction pattern to extract NLss of intra- and inter-modal by exploring interactions of different image pixels in intra- and inter-image positional distance. We commence by preforming GCNs on each intra-modal to aggregate features and propagate information to extract independent intra-modal NLss. Then, GCNs are performed on the concatenate intra-modal NLss features of infrared and visible images, which can explore the cross-domain NLss of inter-modal to reconstruct the fused image. Ablation studies and extensive experiments illustrates the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed method on three datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2023.

Builds on

15 of 58 references.

References · 15

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
  3. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
  4. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
  5. 2020Rethinking Semantic Segmentation from a Sequence-to-Sequence Perspective with Transformerscited by 1,369
  6. 2013Spectral Networks and Locally Connected Networks on Graphscited by 1,102
  7. 2017Dynamic Edge-Conditioned Filters in Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphscited by 310
  8. 2022Vision GNN: An Image is Worth Graph of Nodescited by 186
  9. 2021RFN-Nest: An end-to-end residual fusion network for infrared and visible imagescited by 109
  10. 2017Graph Convolutional Encoders for Syntax-aware Neural Machine Translationcited by 70
  11. 2023Dif-Fusion: Towards High Color Fidelity in Infrared and Visible Image Fusion with Diffusion Modelscited by 56
  12. 2022SwinFuse: A Residual Swin Transformer Fusion Network for Infrared and Visible Imagescited by 25
3 more
  1. 2021Image Fusion Transformercited by 24
  2. 2019Learning Backtrackless Aligned-Spatial Graph Convolutional Networks for Graph Classificationcited by 13
  3. 2022Learnable Graph Convolutional Network and Feature Fusion for Multi-view Learningcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.