mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Is GPT Powerful Enough to Analyze the Emotions of Memes?

arXiv 2311.00223 ↗First posted 1 Nov 2023cs.CL cs.MMcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs), representing a significant achievement in artificial intelligence (AI) research, have demonstrated their ability in a multitude of tasks. This project aims to explore the capabilities of GPT-3.5, a leading example of LLMs, in processing the sentiment analysis of Internet memes. Memes, which include both verbal and visual aspects, act as a powerful yet complex tool for expressing ideas and sentiments, demanding an understanding of societal norms and cultural contexts. Notably, the detection and moderation of hateful memes pose a significant challenge due to their implicit offensive nature. This project investigates GPT's proficiency in such subjective tasks, revealing its strengths and potential limitations. The tasks include the classification of meme sentiment, determination of humor type, and detection of implicit hate in memes. The performance evaluation, using datasets from SemEval-2020 Task 8 and Facebook hateful memes, offers a comparative understanding of GPT responses against human annotations. Despite GPT's remarkable progress, our findings underscore the challenges faced by these models in handling subjective tasks, which are rooted in their inherent limitations including contextual understanding, interpretation of implicit meanings, and data biases. This research contributes to the broader discourse on the applicability of AI in handling complex, context-dependent tasks, and offers valuable insights for future advancements.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2023.

Builds on

19 of 31 references.

References · 19

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  4. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  5. 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,919
  6. 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,433
  7. 2022Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agentscited by 1,035
  8. 2023MM-REACT: Prompting ChatGPT for Multimodal Reasoning and Actioncited by 517
  9. 2022Socratic Models: Composing Zero-Shot Multimodal Reasoning with Languagecited by 513
  10. 2020The Hateful Memes Challenge: Detecting Hate Speech in Multimodal Memescited by 490
  11. 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 481
  12. 2023ART: Automatic multi-step reasoning and tool-use for large language modelscited by 197
7 more
  1. 2022PromptCap: Prompt-Guided Task-Aware Image Captioningcited by 104
  2. 2022ChatGPT Makes Medicine Easy to Swallow: An Exploratory Case Study on Simplified Radiology Reportscited by 101
  3. 2021MOMENTA: A Multimodal Framework for Detecting Harmful Memes and Their Targetscited by 86
  4. 2020SemEval-2020 Task 8: Memotion Analysis -- The Visuo-Lingual Metaphor!cited by 78
  5. 2022Detecting and Understanding Harmful Memes: A Surveycited by 58
  6. 2021Detecting Hate Speech with GPT-3cited by 56
  7. 2023Characterizing the Entities in Harmful Memes: Who is the Hero, the Villain, the Victim?cited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.