mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Longer Fixations, More Computation: Gaze-Guided Recurrent Neural Networks

arXiv 2311.00159 ↗First posted 31 Oct 2023cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Humans read texts at a varying pace, while machine learning models treat each token in the same way in terms of a computational process. Therefore, we ask, does it help to make models act more like humans? In this paper, we convert this intuition into a set of novel models with fixation-guided parallel RNNs or layers and conduct various experiments on language modeling and sentiment analysis tasks to test their effectiveness, thus providing empirical validation for this intuition. Our proposed models achieve good performance on the language modeling task, considerably surpassing the baseline model. In addition, we find that, interestingly, the fixation duration predicted by neural networks bears some resemblance to humans' fixation. Without any explicit guidance, the model makes similar choices to humans. We also investigate the reasons for the differences between them, which explain why "model fixations" are often more suitable than human fixations, when used to guide language models.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2023.

Builds on

17 of 41 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
  4. 2018Colorless green recurrent networks dream hierarchicallycited by 213
  5. 2017Regularizing and Optimizing LSTM Language Modelscited by 205
  6. 2022What Artificial Neural Networks Can Tell Us About Human Language Acquisitioncited by 99
  7. 2016Tying Word Vectors and Word Classifiers: A Loss Framework for Language Modelingcited by 92
  8. 2019ZuCo 2.0: A Dataset of Physiological Recordings During Natural Reading and Annotationcited by 66
  9. 2020Improving Natural Language Processing Tasks with Human Gaze-Guided Neural Attentioncited by 45
  10. 2020Interpreting Attention Models with Human Visual Attention in Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 29
  11. 2019Entity Recognition at First Sight: Improving NER with Eye Movement Informationcited by 26
  12. 2016Improving sentence compression by learning to predict gazecited by 24
5 more
  1. 2023Synthesizing Human Gaze Feedback for Improved NLP Performancecited by 16
  2. 2021A Survey on Using Gaze Behaviour for Natural Language Processingcited by 11
  3. 2016Modeling Human Reading with Neural Attentioncited by 10
  4. 2018Modeling Task Effects in Human Reading with Neural Network-based Attentioncited by 9
  5. 2022Every word counts: A multilingual analysis of individual human alignment with model attentioncited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

3 papers.