mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Modeling Task Effects in Human Reading with Neural Network-based Attention

arXiv 1808.00054 ↗First posted 31 Jul 2018cs.CLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Research on human reading has long documented that reading behavior shows task-specific effects, but it has been challenging to build general models predicting what reading behavior humans will show in a given task. We introduce NEAT, a computational model of the allocation of attention in human reading, based on the hypothesis that human reading optimizes a tradeoff between economy of attention and success at a task. Our model is implemented using contemporary neural network modeling techniques, and makes explicit and testable predictions about how the allocation of attention varies across different tasks. We test this in an eyetracking study comparing two versions of a reading comprehension task, finding that our model successfully accounts for reading behavior across the tasks. Our work thus provides evidence that task effects can be modeled as optimal adaptation to task demands.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

9 papers.