Two-Stage Classifier for Campaign Negativity Detection using Axis Embeddings: A Case Study on Tweets of Political Users during 2021 Presidential Election in Iran
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In elections around the world, the candidates may turn their campaigns toward negativity due to the prospect of failure and time pressure. In the digital age, social media platforms such as Twitter are rich sources of political discourse. Therefore, despite the large amount of data that is published on Twitter, the automatic system for campaign negativity detection can play an essential role in understanding the strategy of candidates and parties in their campaigns. In this paper, we propose a hybrid model for detecting campaign negativity consisting of a two-stage classifier that combines the strengths of two machine learning models. Here, we have collected Persian tweets from 50 political users, including candidates and government officials. Then we annotated 5,100 of them that were published during the year before the 2021 presidential election in Iran. In the proposed model, first, the required datasets of two classifiers based on the cosine similarity of tweet embeddings with axis embeddings (which are the average of embedding in positive and negative classes of tweets) from the training set (85%) are made, and then these datasets are considered the training set of the two classifiers in the hybrid model. Finally, our best model (RF-RF) was able to achieve 79% for the macro F1 score and 82% for the weighted F1 score. By running the best model on the rest of the tweets of 50 political users that were published one year before the election and with the help of statistical models, we find that the publication of a tweet by a candidate has nothing to do with the negativity of that tweet, and the presence of the names of political persons and political organizations in the tweet is directly related to its negativity.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2023.
Builds on
12 of 45 references.
References · 12
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
- 2019How multilingual is Multilingual BERT?cited by 645
- 2019Text Classification Algorithms: A Surveycited by 163
- 2015High-Dimensional Asymptotics of Prediction: Ridge Regression and Classificationcited by 148
- 2020Deep Learning Based Text Classification: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 141
- 2020ParsBERT: Transformer-based Model for Persian Language Understandingcited by 93
- 2020A Survey on Text Classification: From Shallow to Deep Learningcited by 80
- 2021Are we ready for a new paradigm shift? A Survey on Visual Deep MLPcited by 63
- 2020Dynamical mean-field theory for stochastic gradient descent in Gaussian mixture classificationcited by 60
- 2022Problems with Cosine as a Measure of Embedding Similarity for High Frequency Wordscited by 49
- 2018A La Carte Embedding: Cheap but Effective Induction of Semantic Feature Vectorscited by 17
- 2019Applicability and Interpretability of Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering With or Without Contiguity Constraintscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.