Initialization Matters: Privacy-Utility Analysis of Overparameterized Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We analytically investigate how over-parameterization of models in randomized machine learning algorithms impacts the information leakage about their training data. Specifically, we prove a privacy bound for the KL divergence between model distributions on worst-case neighboring datasets, and explore its dependence on the initialization, width, and depth of fully connected neural networks. We find that this KL privacy bound is largely determined by the expected squared gradient norm relative to model parameters during training. Notably, for the special setting of linearized network, our analysis indicates that the squared gradient norm (and therefore the escalation of privacy loss) is tied directly to the per-layer variance of the initialization distribution. By using this analysis, we demonstrate that privacy bound improves with increasing depth under certain initializations (LeCun and Xavier), while degrades with increasing depth under other initializations (He and NTK). Our work reveals a complex interplay between privacy and depth that depends on the chosen initialization distribution. We further prove excess empirical risk bounds under a fixed KL privacy budget, and show that the interplay between privacy utility trade-off and depth is similarly affected by the initialization.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2023.
Builds on
42 of 59 references.
References · 42
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
- 2018A Convergence Theory for Deep Learning via Over-Parameterizationcited by 784
- 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 732
- 2018On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programmingcited by 671
- 2018Gradient Descent Provably Optimizes Over-parameterized Neural Networkscited by 655
- 2018Gradient Descent Finds Global Minima of Deep Neural Networkscited by 572
- 2019Fine-Grained Analysis of Optimization and Generalization for Overparameterized Two-Layer Neural Networkscited by 562
- 2015Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descentcited by 547
30 more
- 2022Sampling is as easy as learning the score: theory for diffusion models with minimal data assumptionscited by 440
- 2018Privacy Amplification by Subsampling: Tight Analyses via Couplings and Divergencescited by 237
- 2019Rapid Convergence of the Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm: Isoperimetry Sufficescited by 224
- 2019Generalization Bounds of Stochastic Gradient Descent for Wide and Deep Neural Networkscited by 221
- 2019Private Stochastic Convex Optimization with Optimal Ratescited by 183
- 2020Stability of Stochastic Gradient Descent on Nonsmooth Convex Lossescited by 172
- 2021A Universal Law of Robustness via Isoperimetrycited by 150
- 2022Reconstructing Training Data with Informed Adversariescited by 143
- 2022Reconstructing Training Data from Trained Neural Networkscited by 129
- 2014Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization: Efficient Algorithms and Tight Error Boundscited by 104
- 2015Algorithmic Stability for Adaptive Data Analysiscited by 88
- 2020Tight Bounds on the Smallest Eigenvalue of the Neural Tangent Kernel for Deep ReLU Networkscited by 87
- 2021Private Stochastic Convex Optimization: Optimal Rates in ℓ1 Geometrycited by 83
- 2020Phase diagram for two-layer ReLU neural networks at infinite-width limitcited by 65
- 2020Neural Kernels Without Tangentscited by 56
- 2021What can linearized neural networks actually say about generalization?cited by 49
- 2022When Does Differentially Private Learning Not Suffer in High Dimensions?cited by 48
- 2021Differentially Private Stochastic Optimization: New Results in Convex and Non-Convex Settingscited by 45
- 2021On the Convergence and Calibration of Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 36
- 2020Faster Differentially Private Samplers via R'enyi Divergence Analysis of Discretized Langevin MCMCcited by 27
- 2014Private Empirical Risk Minimization Beyond the Worst Case: The Effect of the Constraint Set Geometrycited by 24
- 2021Covariate Shift in High-Dimensional Random Feature Regressioncited by 24
- 2022Optimal Membership Inference Bounds for Adaptive Composition of Sampled Gaussian Mechanismscited by 19
- 2022Robustness in deep learning: The good (width), the bad (depth), and the ugly (initialization)cited by 18
- 2022A Blessing of Dimensionality in Membership Inference through Regularizationcited by 17
- 2022Analyzing Privacy Leakage in Machine Learning via Multiple Hypothesis Testing: A Lesson From Fanocited by 16
- 2022Parameters or Privacy: A Provable Tradeoff Between Overparameterization and Membership Inferencecited by 14
- 2021When is the Convergence Time of Langevin Algorithms Dimension Independent? A Composite Optimization Viewpointcited by 12
- 2016On-Average KL-Privacy and its equivalence to Generalization for Max-Entropy Mechanismscited by 10
- 2022Differentially Private Learning with Margin Guaranteescited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 7; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2024Pre-training Differentially Private Models with Limited Public Datacited by 8
- 2024Neural Collapse Meets Differential Privacy: Curious Behaviors of NoisyGD with Near-perfect Representation Learningcited by 8
- 2024Characterizing the Training Dynamics of Private Fine-tuning with Langevin diffusioncited by 4
- 2024Defending Membership Inference Attacks via Privacy-aware Sparsity Tuningcited by 4
- 2024Training Data Reconstruction: Privacy due to Uncertainty?cited by 4
- 2024Combining Machine Learning Defenses without Conflictscited by 2
- 2025WARP: Weight Teleportation for Attack-Resilient Unlearning Protocolscited by 1
- 2024Hybrid Coordinate Descent for Efficient Neural Network Learning Using Line Search and Gradient Descentcited by 0
- 2026Differential Privacy of Gaussian Process Posterior Samplingcited by 0
- 2026Differential Privacy of Gaussian Process Posterior Sampling16 Jun 2026
- 2025WARP: Weight Teleportation for Attack-Resilient Unlearning Protocols29 Nov 2025
- 2024Training Data Reconstruction: Privacy due to Uncertainty?11 Dec 2024
- 2024Combining Machine Learning Defenses without Conflicts14 Nov 2024
- 2024Defending Membership Inference Attacks via Privacy-aware Sparsity Tuning9 Oct 2024
- 2024Hybrid Coordinate Descent for Efficient Neural Network Learning Using Line Search and Gradient Descent2 Aug 2024
- 2024Neural Collapse Meets Differential Privacy: Curious Behaviors of NoisyGD with Near-perfect Representation Learning14 May 2024
- 2024Characterizing the Training Dynamics of Private Fine-tuning with Langevin diffusion29 Feb 2024
- 2024Pre-training Differentially Private Models with Limited Public Data28 Feb 2024