mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Initialization Matters: Privacy-Utility Analysis of Overparameterized Neural Networks

arXiv 2310.20579 ↗First posted 31 Oct 2023stat.ML cs.CR cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We analytically investigate how over-parameterization of models in randomized machine learning algorithms impacts the information leakage about their training data. Specifically, we prove a privacy bound for the KL divergence between model distributions on worst-case neighboring datasets, and explore its dependence on the initialization, width, and depth of fully connected neural networks. We find that this KL privacy bound is largely determined by the expected squared gradient norm relative to model parameters during training. Notably, for the special setting of linearized network, our analysis indicates that the squared gradient norm (and therefore the escalation of privacy loss) is tied directly to the per-layer variance of the initialization distribution. By using this analysis, we demonstrate that privacy bound improves with increasing depth under certain initializations (LeCun and Xavier), while degrades with increasing depth under other initializations (He and NTK). Our work reveals a complex interplay between privacy and depth that depends on the chosen initialization distribution. We further prove excess empirical risk bounds under a fixed KL privacy budget, and show that the interplay between privacy utility trade-off and depth is similarly affected by the initialization.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2023.

Builds on

42 of 59 references.

References · 42

  1. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  2. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  3. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
  4. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  5. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  6. 2018A Convergence Theory for Deep Learning via Over-Parameterizationcited by 784
  7. 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 732
  8. 2018On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programmingcited by 671
  9. 2018Gradient Descent Provably Optimizes Over-parameterized Neural Networkscited by 655
  10. 2018Gradient Descent Finds Global Minima of Deep Neural Networkscited by 572
  11. 2019Fine-Grained Analysis of Optimization and Generalization for Overparameterized Two-Layer Neural Networkscited by 562
  12. 2015Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descentcited by 547
30 more
  1. 2022Sampling is as easy as learning the score: theory for diffusion models with minimal data assumptionscited by 440
  2. 2018Privacy Amplification by Subsampling: Tight Analyses via Couplings and Divergencescited by 237
  3. 2019Rapid Convergence of the Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm: Isoperimetry Sufficescited by 224
  4. 2019Generalization Bounds of Stochastic Gradient Descent for Wide and Deep Neural Networkscited by 221
  5. 2019Private Stochastic Convex Optimization with Optimal Ratescited by 183
  6. 2020Stability of Stochastic Gradient Descent on Nonsmooth Convex Lossescited by 172
  7. 2021A Universal Law of Robustness via Isoperimetrycited by 150
  8. 2022Reconstructing Training Data with Informed Adversariescited by 143
  9. 2022Reconstructing Training Data from Trained Neural Networkscited by 129
  10. 2014Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization: Efficient Algorithms and Tight Error Boundscited by 104
  11. 2015Algorithmic Stability for Adaptive Data Analysiscited by 88
  12. 2020Tight Bounds on the Smallest Eigenvalue of the Neural Tangent Kernel for Deep ReLU Networkscited by 87
  13. 2021Private Stochastic Convex Optimization: Optimal Rates in ℓ1 Geometrycited by 83
  14. 2020Phase diagram for two-layer ReLU neural networks at infinite-width limitcited by 65
  15. 2020Neural Kernels Without Tangentscited by 56
  16. 2021What can linearized neural networks actually say about generalization?cited by 49
  17. 2022When Does Differentially Private Learning Not Suffer in High Dimensions?cited by 48
  18. 2021Differentially Private Stochastic Optimization: New Results in Convex and Non-Convex Settingscited by 45
  19. 2021On the Convergence and Calibration of Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 36
  20. 2020Faster Differentially Private Samplers via R'enyi Divergence Analysis of Discretized Langevin MCMCcited by 27
  21. 2014Private Empirical Risk Minimization Beyond the Worst Case: The Effect of the Constraint Set Geometrycited by 24
  22. 2021Covariate Shift in High-Dimensional Random Feature Regressioncited by 24
  23. 2022Optimal Membership Inference Bounds for Adaptive Composition of Sampled Gaussian Mechanismscited by 19
  24. 2022Robustness in deep learning: The good (width), the bad (depth), and the ugly (initialization)cited by 18
  25. 2022A Blessing of Dimensionality in Membership Inference through Regularizationcited by 17
  26. 2022Analyzing Privacy Leakage in Machine Learning via Multiple Hypothesis Testing: A Lesson From Fanocited by 16
  27. 2022Parameters or Privacy: A Provable Tradeoff Between Overparameterization and Membership Inferencecited by 14
  28. 2021When is the Convergence Time of Langevin Algorithms Dimension Independent? A Composite Optimization Viewpointcited by 12
  29. 2016On-Average KL-Privacy and its equivalence to Generalization for Max-Entropy Mechanismscited by 10
  30. 2022Differentially Private Learning with Margin Guaranteescited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 7; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

9 papers.