Exploring Practitioner Perspectives On Training Data Attribution Explanations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Explainable AI (XAI) aims to provide insight into opaque model reasoning to humans and as such is an interdisciplinary field by nature. In this paper, we interviewed 10 practitioners to understand the possible usability of training data attribution (TDA) explanations and to explore the design space of such an approach. We confirmed that training data quality is often the most important factor for high model performance in practice and model developers mainly rely on their own experience to curate data. End-users expect explanations to enhance their interaction with the model and do not necessarily prioritise but are open to training data as a means of explanation. Within our participants, we found that TDA explanations are not well-known and therefore not used. We urge the community to focus on the utility of TDA techniques from the human-machine collaboration perspective and broaden the TDA evaluation to reflect common use cases in practice.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2023.
Builds on
19 of 29 references.
References · 19
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2022Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervisioncited by 4,057
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
- 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
- 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 580
- 2023TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at Scalecited by 283
- 2020Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiencescited by 253
- 2020Influence Functions in Deep Learning Are Fragilecited by 252
- 2022Datamodels: Predicting Predictions from Training Datacited by 189
- 2019On the Accuracy of Influence Functions for Measuring Group Effectscited by 147
- 2022Training Data Influence Analysis and Estimation: A Surveycited by 135
7 more
- 2021Scaling Up Influence Functionscited by 132
- 2020FastIF: Scalable Influence Functions for Efficient Model Interpretation and Debuggingcited by 120
- 2018Understanding the Origins of Bias in Word Embeddingscited by 91
- 2020Human-centered Explainable AI: Towards a Reflective Sociotechnical Approachcited by 90
- 2021Interactive Label Cleaning with Example-based Explanationscited by 49
- 2021The Who in XAI: How AI Background Shapes Perceptions of AI Explanationscited by 48
- 2021Combining Feature and Instance Attribution to Detect Artifactscited by 38
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2023Unifying Corroborative and Contributive Attributions in Large Language Modelscited by 10
- 2024Quanda: An Interpretability Toolkit for Training Data Attribution Evaluation and Beyondcited by 2
- 2026Attributing Cohen's d: Training Data Attribution for Disease-Related Effects in Normative Age Biomarkerscited by 0
- 2026Attributing Cohen's d: Training Data Attribution for Disease-Related Effects in Normative Age Biomarkers7 Sep 2026
- 2024Quanda: An Interpretability Toolkit for Training Data Attribution Evaluation and Beyond9 Oct 2024
- 2023Unifying Corroborative and Contributive Attributions in Large Language Models20 Nov 2023