Evaluating LLP Methods: Challenges and Approaches
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning from Label Proportions (LLP) is an established machine learning problem with numerous real-world applications. In this setting, data items are grouped into bags, and the goal is to learn individual item labels, knowing only the features of the data and the proportions of labels in each bag. Although LLP is a well-established problem, it has several unusual aspects that create challenges for benchmarking learning methods. Fundamental complications arise because of the existence of different LLP variants, i.e., dependence structures that can exist between items, labels, and bags. Accordingly, the first algorithmic challenge is the generation of variant-specific datasets capturing the diversity of dependence structures and bag characteristics. The second methodological challenge is model selection, i.e., hyperparameter tuning; due to the nature of LLP, model selection cannot easily use the standard machine learning paradigm. The final benchmarking challenge consists of properly evaluating LLP solution methods across various LLP variants. We note that there is very little consideration of these issues in prior work, and there are no general solutions for these challenges proposed to date. To address these challenges, we develop methods capable of generating LLP datasets meeting the requirements of different variants. We use these methods to generate a collection of datasets encompassing the spectrum of LLP problem characteristics, which can be used in future evaluation studies. Additionally, we develop guidelines for benchmarking LLP algorithms, including the model selection and evaluation steps. Finally, we illustrate the new methods and guidelines by performing an extensive benchmark of a set of well-known LLP algorithms. We show that choosing the best algorithm depends critically on the LLP variant and model selection method, demonstrating the need for our proposed approach.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2023.
Builds on
15 of 49 references.
References · 15
- 2018Model Evaluation, Model Selection, and Algorithm Selection in Machine Learningcited by 157
- 2017Model-Powered Conditional Independence Testcited by 43
- 2014On Learning from Label Proportionscited by 38
- 2019CCMI : Classifier based Conditional Mutual Information Estimationcited by 37
- 2019Learning from Label Proportions with Consistency Regularizationcited by 34
- 2019Deep multi-class learning from label proportionscited by 33
- 2017Co-training for Demographic Classification Using Deep Learning from Label Proportionscited by 28
- 2019Learning from Label Proportions with Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 25
- 2021Two-stage Training for Learning from Label Proportionscited by 19
- 2018Fast Conditional Independence Test for Vector Variables with Large Sample Sizescited by 16
- 2013proptoSVM for learning with label proportionscited by 7
- 2020Learning from Label Proportions: A Mutual Contamination Frameworkcited by 6
3 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.