mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

LLP-Bench: A Large Scale Tabular Benchmark for Learning from Label Proportions

arXiv 2310.10096 ↗First posted 16 Oct 2023cs.LG stat.MLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the task of Learning from Label Proportions (LLP), a model is trained on groups (a.k.a bags) of instances and their corresponding label proportions to predict labels for individual instances. LLP has been applied pre-dominantly on two types of datasets - image and tabular. In image LLP, bags of fixed size are created by randomly sampling instances from an underlying dataset. Bags created via this methodology are called random bags. Experimentation on Image LLP has been mostly on random bags on CIFAR-* and MNIST datasets. Despite being a very crucial task in privacy sensitive applications, tabular LLP does not yet have a open, large scale LLP benchmark. One of the unique properties of tabular LLP is the ability to create feature bags where all the instances in a bag have the same value for a given feature. It has been shown in prior research that feature bags are very common in practical, real world applications [Chen et. al '23, Saket et. al. '22]. In this paper, we address the lack of a open, large scale tabular benchmark. First we propose LLP-Bench, a suite of 70 LLP datasets (62 feature bag and 8 random bag datasets) created from the Criteo CTR prediction and the Criteo Sponsored Search Conversion Logs datasets, the former a classification and the latter a regression dataset. These LLP datasets represent diverse ways in which bags can be constructed from underlying tabular data. To the best of our knowledge, LLP-Bench is the first large scale tabular LLP benchmark with an extensive diversity in constituent datasets. Second, we propose four metrics that characterize and quantify the hardness of a LLP dataset. Using these four metrics we present deep analysis of the 62 feature bag datasets in LLP-Bench. Finally we present the performance of 9 SOTA and popular tabular LLP techniques on all the 62 datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2023.

Builds on

13 of 42 references.

References · 13

  1. 2018AutoInt: Automatic Feature Interaction Learning via Self-Attentive Neural Networkscited by 320
  2. 2019Learning from Label Proportions with Consistency Regularizationcited by 34
  3. 2019Deep multi-class learning from label proportionscited by 33
  4. 2022Learning from Label Proportions by Learning with Label Noisecited by 30
  5. 2017Co-training for Demographic Classification Using Deep Learning from Label Proportionscited by 28
  6. 2019Learning from Label Proportions with Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 25
  7. 2017Weakly Supervised Classification in High Energy Physicscited by 21
  8. 2023Easy Learning from Label Proportionscited by 20
  9. 2021Two-stage Training for Learning from Label Proportionscited by 19
  10. 2018Reacting to Variations in Product Demand: An Application for Conversion Rate (CR) Prediction in Sponsored Searchcited by 18
  11. 2018Deep Learning from Label Proportions for Emphysema Quantificationcited by 13
  12. 2023Learning from Aggregated Data: Curated Bags versus Random Bagscited by 11
1 more
  1. 2022Challenges and approaches to privacy preserving post-click conversion predictioncited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

5 papers.