Efficient kernel surrogates for neural network-based regression
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite their immense promise in performing a variety of learning tasks, a theoretical understanding of the limitations of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) has so far eluded practitioners. This is partly due to the inability to determine the closed forms of the learned functions, making it harder to study their generalization properties on unseen datasets. Recent work has shown that randomly initialized DNNs in the infinite width limit converge to kernel machines relying on a Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) with known closed form. These results suggest, and experimental evidence corroborates, that empirical kernel machines can also act as surrogates for finite width DNNs. The high computational cost of assembling the full NTK, however, makes this approach infeasible in practice, motivating the need for low-cost approximations. In the current work, we study the performance of the Conjugate Kernel (CK), an efficient approximation to the NTK that has been observed to yield fairly similar results. For the regression problem of smooth functions and logistic regression classification, we show that the CK performance is only marginally worse than that of the NTK and, in certain cases, is shown to be superior. In particular, we establish bounds for the relative test losses, verify them with numerical tests, and identify the regularity of the kernel as the key determinant of performance. In addition to providing a theoretical grounding for using CKs instead of NTKs, our framework suggests a recipe for improving DNN accuracy inexpensively. We present a demonstration of this on the foundation model GPT-2 by comparing its performance on a classification task using a conventional approach and our prescription. We also show how our approach can be used to improve physics-informed operator network training for regression tasks as well as convolutional neural network training for vision classification tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2023.
Builds on
24 of 40 references.
References · 24
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
- 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
- 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,124
- 2023The RefinedWeb Dataset for Falcon LLM: Outperforming Curated Corpora with Web Data, and Web Data Onlycited by 755
- 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 732
- 2019On Exact Computation with an Infinitely Wide Neural Netcited by 572
12 more
- 2021Learning the solution operator of parametric partial differential equations with physics-informed DeepOnetscited by 537
- 2021Deep learning: a statistical viewpointcited by 239
- 2020Deep learning versus kernel learning: an empirical study of loss landscape geometry and the time evolution of the Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 185
- 2018Optimal approximation of continuous functions by very deep ReLU networkscited by 165
- 2018Bayesian Deep Convolutional Networks with Many Channels are Gaussian Processescited by 164
- 2021Fit without fear: remarkable mathematical phenomena of deep learning through the prism of interpolationcited by 130
- 2020On the linearity of large non-linear models: when and why the tangent kernel is constantcited by 129
- 2020Kernel methods through the roof: handling billions of points efficientlycited by 88
- 2021Improved architectures and training algorithms for deep operator networkscited by 85
- 2020Spectra of the Conjugate Kernel and Neural Tangent Kernel for linear-width neural networkscited by 76
- 2022Fast Finite Width Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 62
- 2022Multifidelity Deep Operator Networks For Data-Driven and Physics-Informed Problemscited by 57
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.
7 papers.
- 2023Stacked networks improve physics-informed training: applications to neural networks and deep operator networkscited by 21
- 2024Multifidelity domain decomposition-based physics-informed neural networks and operators for time-dependent problemscited by 4
- 2024Understanding Generative AI Content with Embedding Modelscited by 4
- 2024What do physics-informed DeepONets learn? Understanding and improving training for scientific computing applicationscited by 3
- 2026Is the Last Layer Sufficient for Uncertainty Quantification?cited by 1
- 2026Improving the accuracy of physics-informed neural networks via last-layer retrainingcited by 0
- 2026Kernel Reboot: Breaking the Boundaries of Neural Tangent Kernels for Neural Fieldscited by 0
- 2026Kernel Reboot: Breaking the Boundaries of Neural Tangent Kernels for Neural Fields2 Sep 2026
- 2026Is the Last Layer Sufficient for Uncertainty Quantification?29 May 2026
- 2026Improving the accuracy of physics-informed neural networks via last-layer retraining4 Mar 2026
- 2024What do physics-informed DeepONets learn? Understanding and improving training for scientific computing applications27 Nov 2024
- 2024Understanding Generative AI Content with Embedding Models19 Aug 2024
- 2024Multifidelity domain decomposition-based physics-informed neural networks and operators for time-dependent problems15 Jan 2024
- 2023Stacked networks improve physics-informed training: applications to neural networks and deep operator networks11 Nov 2023