Harnessing GPT-3.5-turbo for Rhetorical Role Prediction in Legal Cases
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose a comprehensive study of one-stage elicitation techniques for querying a large pre-trained generative transformer (GPT-3.5-turbo) in the rhetorical role prediction task of legal cases. This task is known as requiring textual context to be addressed. Our study explores strategies such as zero-few shots, task specification with definitions and clarification of annotation ambiguities, textual context and reasoning with general prompts and specific questions. We show that the number of examples, the definition of labels, the presentation of the (labelled) textual context and specific questions about this context have a positive influence on the performance of the model. Given non-equivalent test set configurations, we observed that prompting with a few labelled examples from direct context can lead the model to a better performance than a supervised fined-tuned multi-class classifier based on the BERT encoder (weighted F1 score of = 72%). But there is still a gap to reach the performance of the best systems = 86%) in the LegalEval 2023 task which, on the other hand, require dedicated resources, architectures and training.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2023.
Builds on
21 of 24 references.
References · 21
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
- 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,483
- 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,371
- 2021What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?cited by 1,184
- 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,122
- 2022Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 593
- 2023Augmented Language Models: a Surveycited by 398
- 2022Complexity-Based Prompting for Multi-Step Reasoningcited by 387
9 more
- 2022Reasoning with Language Model Prompting: A Surveycited by 251
- 2022The Unreliability of Explanations in Few-shot Prompting for Textual Reasoningcited by 169
- 2023Active Prompting with Chain-of-Thought for Large Language Modelscited by 154
- 2023Unlocking Practical Applications in Legal Domain: Evaluation of GPT for Zero-Shot Semantic Annotation of Legal Textscited by 32
- 2021Semantic Segmentation of Legal Documents via Rhetorical Rolescited by 26
- 2022Corpus for Automatic Structuring of Legal Documentscited by 25
- 2021Cross-Domain Multi-Task Learning for Sequential Sentence Classification in Research Paperscited by 11
- 2023SemEval 2023 Task 6: LegalEval - Understanding Legal Textscited by 7
- 2023Enhancing Pre-Trained Language Models with Sentence Position Embeddings for Rhetorical Roles Recognition in Legal Opinionscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 4.
8 papers.
- 2025Large Language Models for Computer-Aided Design: A Surveycited by 16
- 2025MARRO: Multi-headed Attention for Rhetorical Role Labeling in Legal Documentscited by 2
- 2025QueryBandits for Hallucination Mitigation: Exploiting Semantic Features for No-Regret Rewritingcited by 1
- 2026Coupling Local Context and Global Semantic Prototypes via a Hierarchical Architecture for Rhetorical Roles Labelingcited by 1
- 2024Impacts of Continued Legal Pre-Training and IFT on LLMs' Latent Representations of Human-Defined Legal Conceptscited by 0
- 2026No One Size Fits All: QueryBandits for Hallucination Mitigationcited by 0
- 2026Semantic Reranking at Inference Time for Hard Examples in Rhetorical Role Labelingcited by 0
- 2026From Judgments to Issues: Structured Extraction of Legal Reasoning with Citation-Hallucination Controlcited by 0
- 2026From Judgments to Issues: Structured Extraction of Legal Reasoning with Citation-Hallucination Control3 Jul 2026
- 2026Semantic Reranking at Inference Time for Hard Examples in Rhetorical Role Labeling18 May 2026
- 2026Coupling Local Context and Global Semantic Prototypes via a Hierarchical Architecture for Rhetorical Roles Labeling4 Mar 2026
- 2026No One Size Fits All: QueryBandits for Hallucination Mitigation23 Feb 2026
- 2025QueryBandits for Hallucination Mitigation: Exploiting Semantic Features for No-Regret Rewriting22 Aug 2025
- 2025Large Language Models for Computer-Aided Design: A Survey13 May 2025
- 2025MARRO: Multi-headed Attention for Rhetorical Role Labeling in Legal Documents8 Mar 2025
- 2024Impacts of Continued Legal Pre-Training and IFT on LLMs' Latent Representations of Human-Defined Legal Concepts15 Oct 2024