mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Demonstration-Regularized RL

arXiv 2310.17303 ↗First posted 26 Oct 2023stat.ML cs.LGcited by 8

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

Incorporating expert demonstrations has empirically helped to improve the sample efficiency of reinforcement learning (RL). This paper quantifies theoretically to what extent this extra information reduces RL's sample complexity. In particular, we study the demonstration-regularized reinforcement learning that leverages the expert demonstrations by KL-regularization for a policy learned by behavior cloning. Our findings reveal that using NE expert demonstrations enables the identification of an optimal policy at a sample complexity of order widetildeO(Poly(S,A,H)/(varepsilon2 NE)) in finite and widetildeO(Poly(d,H)/(varepsilon2 NE)) in linear Markov decision processes, where varepsilon is the target precision, H the horizon, A the number of action, S the number of states in the finite case and d the dimension of the feature space in the linear case. As a by-product, we provide tight convergence guarantees for the behaviour cloning procedure under general assumptions on the policy classes. Additionally, we establish that demonstration-regularized methods are provably efficient for reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). In this respect, we provide theoretical evidence showing the benefits of KL-regularization for RLHF in tabular and linear MDPs. Interestingly, we avoid pessimism injection by employing computationally feasible regularization to handle reward estimation uncertainty, thus setting our approach apart from the prior works.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 14 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2023.

Builds on

14 of 79 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback1 Sep
  2. 2023Is RLHF More Difficult than Standard RL?25 Jun
  3. 2023Provable Reward-Agnostic Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning29 May
  4. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences18 Sep

Other references · 10

  1. 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,084
  2. 2020AWAC: Accelerating Online Reinforcement Learning with Offline Datasetscited by 647
  3. 2017Minimax Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learningcited by 500
  4. 2018Is Q-learning Provably Efficient?cited by 485
  5. 2017Leveraging Demonstrations for Deep Reinforcement Learning on Robotics Problems with Sparse Rewardscited by 302
  6. 2019Tighter Problem-Dependent Regret Bounds in Reinforcement Learning without Domain Knowledge using Value Function Boundscited by 194
  7. 2017Unifying PAC and Regret: Uniform PAC Bounds for Episodic Reinforcement Learningcited by 175
  8. 2017A unified view of entropy-regularized Markov decision processescited by 174
  9. 2018Reinforcement and Imitation Learning for Diverse Visuomotor Skillscited by 124
  10. 2023Provable Offline Preference-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 55

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022Efficient Reinforcement Learning from Demonstration Using Local Ensemble and Reparameterization with Split and Merge of Expert Policies
  2. 2024Sharp Analysis for KL-Regularized Contextual Bandits and RLHF
  3. 2022A Few Expert Queries Suffices for Sample-Efficient RL with Resets and Linear Value Approximation
  4. 2026Rainbow-DemoRL: Combining Improvements in Demonstration-Augmented Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2023A Connection between One-Step Regularization and Critic Regularization in Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2021Comparison and Unification of Three Regularization Methods in Batch Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2023Iteratively Refined Behavior Regularization for Offline Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2021Efficiently Training On-Policy Actor-Critic Networks in Robotic Deep Reinforcement Learning with Demonstration-like Sampled Exploration