On Pixel-level Performance Assessment in Anomaly Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Anomaly detection methods have demonstrated remarkable success across various applications. However, assessing their performance, particularly at the pixel-level, presents a complex challenge due to the severe imbalance that is most commonly present between normal and abnormal samples. Commonly adopted evaluation metrics designed for pixel-level detection may not effectively capture the nuanced performance variations arising from this class imbalance. In this paper, we dissect the intricacies of this challenge, underscored by visual evidence and statistical analysis, leading to delve into the need for evaluation metrics that account for the imbalance. We offer insights into more accurate metrics, using eleven leading contemporary anomaly detection methods on twenty-one anomaly detection problems. Overall, from this extensive experimental evaluation, we can conclude that Precision-Recall-based metrics can better capture relative method performance, making them more suitable for the task.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2023.
Builds on
14 of 17 references.
References · 14
- 2021Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detectioncited by 776
- 2020PaDiM: a Patch Distribution Modeling Framework for Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 594
- 2021DRAEM -- A discriminatively trained reconstruction embedding for surface anomaly detectioncited by 514
- 2022Anomaly Detection via Reverse Distillation from One-Class Embeddingcited by 421
- 2021CFLOW-AD: Real-Time Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with Localization via Conditional Normalizing Flowscited by 321
- 2021FastFlow: Unsupervised Anomaly Detection and Localization via 2D Normalizing Flowscited by 227
- 2021VT-ADL: A Vision Transformer Network for Image Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 223
- 2021Student-Teacher Feature Pyramid Matching for Anomaly Detectioncited by 146
- 2022CFA: Coupled-hypersphere-based Feature Adaptation for Target-Oriented Anomaly Localizationcited by 135
- 2021Mixed supervision for surface-defect detection: from weakly to fully supervised learningcited by 101
- 2019Probabilistic Modeling of Deep Features for Out-of-Distribution and Adversarial Detectioncited by 39
- 2022CSFlow: Learning Optical Flow via Cross Strip Correlation for Autonomous Drivingcited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 3.
6 papers.
- 2024AnomalyDINO: Boosting Patch-based Few-shot Anomaly Detection with DINOv2cited by 53
- 2024ClipSAM: CLIP and SAM Collaboration for Zero-Shot Anomaly Segmentationcited by 49
- 2025Towards Accurate Unified Anomaly Segmentationcited by 7
- 2024AUPIMO: Redefining Visual Anomaly Detection Benchmarks with High Speed and Low Tolerancecited by 4
- 2025Beyond Academic Benchmarks: Critical Analysis and Best Practices for Visual Industrial Anomaly Detectioncited by 1
- 2025Adversarially Robust Few-Shot Anomaly Detection with Vision Foundation Modelscited by 0
- 2025Adversarially Robust Few-Shot Anomaly Detection with Vision Foundation Models15 Oct 2025
- 2025Beyond Academic Benchmarks: Critical Analysis and Best Practices for Visual Industrial Anomaly Detection30 Mar 2025
- 2025Towards Accurate Unified Anomaly Segmentation21 Jan 2025
- 2024AnomalyDINO: Boosting Patch-based Few-shot Anomaly Detection with DINOv223 May 2024
- 2024ClipSAM: CLIP and SAM Collaboration for Zero-Shot Anomaly Segmentation23 Jan 2024
- 2024AUPIMO: Redefining Visual Anomaly Detection Benchmarks with High Speed and Low Tolerance3 Jan 2024