mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Correction with Backtracking Reduces Hallucination in Summarization

arXiv 2310.16176 ↗First posted 24 Oct 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Abstractive summarization aims at generating natural language summaries of a source document that are succinct while preserving the important elements. Despite recent advances, neural text summarization models are known to be susceptible to hallucinating (or more correctly confabulating), that is to produce summaries with details that are not grounded in the source document. In this paper, we introduce a simple yet efficient technique, CoBa, to reduce hallucination in abstractive summarization. The approach is based on two steps: hallucination detection and mitigation. We show that the former can be achieved through measuring simple statistics about conditional word probabilities and distance to context words. Further, we demonstrate that straight-forward backtracking is surprisingly effective at mitigation. We thoroughly evaluate the proposed method with prior art on three benchmark datasets for text summarization. The results show that CoBa is effective and efficient in reducing hallucination, and offers great adaptability and flexibility. Code can be found at https://github.com/zhenzhel/CoBa.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2023.

Builds on

23 of 30 references.

References · 23

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  3. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
  4. 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,281
  5. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
  6. 2019PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 1,100
  7. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,080
  8. 2020On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 895
  9. 2016Abstractive Text Summarization Using Sequence-to-Sequence RNNs and Beyondcited by 809
  10. 2019Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 578
  11. 2023Textbooks Are All You Need II: phi-1.5 technical reportcited by 559
  12. 2020Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of Summariescited by 376
11 more
  1. 2021Entity-Based Knowledge Conflicts in Question Answeringcited by 349
  2. 2023Trusting Your Evidence: Hallucinate Less with Context-aware Decodingcited by 319
  3. 2023AlignScore: Evaluating Factual Consistency with a Unified Alignment Functioncited by 284
  4. 2023Platypus: Quick, Cheap, and Powerful Refinement of LLMscited by 150
  5. 2023Self-contradictory Hallucinations of Large Language Models: Evaluation, Detection and Mitigationcited by 123
  6. 2019Handling Divergent Reference Texts when Evaluating Table-to-Text Generationcited by 119
  7. 2021Improving Faithfulness in Abstractive Summarization with Contrast Candidate Generation and Selectioncited by 75
  8. 2020Multi-Fact Correction in Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 66
  9. 2019Sticking to the Facts: Confident Decoding for Faithful Data-to-Text Generationcited by 62
  10. 2023Faithfulness-Aware Decoding Strategies for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 31
  11. 2022Don't Say What You Don't Know: Improving the Consistency of Abstractive Summarization by Constraining Beam Searchcited by 23

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 1.

4 papers.