mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Can You Follow Me? Testing Situational Understanding in ChatGPT

arXiv 2310.16135 ↗First posted 24 Oct 2023cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding sentence meanings and updating information states appropriately across time -- what we call "situational understanding" (SU) -- is a critical ability for human-like AI agents. SU is essential in particular for chat models, such as ChatGPT, to enable consistent, coherent, and effective dialogue between humans and AI. Previous works have identified certain SU limitations in non-chatbot Large Language models (LLMs), but the extent and causes of these limitations are not well understood, and capabilities of current chat-based models in this domain have not been explored. In this work we tackle these questions, proposing a novel synthetic environment for SU testing which allows us to do controlled and systematic testing of SU in chat-oriented models, through assessment of models' ability to track and enumerate environment states. Our environment also allows for close analysis of dynamics of model performance, to better understand underlying causes for performance patterns. We apply our test to ChatGPT, the state-of-the-art chatbot, and find that despite the fundamental simplicity of the task, the model's performance reflects an inability to retain correct environment states across time. Our follow-up analyses suggest that performance degradation is largely because ChatGPT has non-persistent in-context memory (although it can access the full dialogue history) and it is susceptible to hallucinated updates -- including updates that artificially inflate accuracies. Our findings suggest overall that ChatGPT is not currently equipped for robust tracking of situation states, and that trust in the impressive dialogue performance of ChatGPT comes with risks. We release the codebase for reproducing our test environment, as well as all prompts and API responses from ChatGPT, at https://github.com/yangalan123/SituationalTesting.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2023.

Builds on

22 of 35 references.

References · 22

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  4. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  5. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  6. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
  7. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
  8. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
  9. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,767
  10. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 979
  11. 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
  12. 2023Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant Contextcited by 820
10 more
  1. 2023Principle-Driven Self-Alignment of Language Models from Scratch with Minimal Human Supervisioncited by 318
  2. 2015Towards AI-Complete Question Answering: A Set of Prerequisite Toy Taskscited by 309
  3. 2018TextWorld: A Learning Environment for Text-based Gamescited by 304
  4. 2019Transferable Multi-Domain State Generator for Task-Oriented Dialogue Systemscited by 215
  5. 2022BlenderBot 3: a deployed conversational agent that continually learns to responsibly engagecited by 197
  6. 2021Implicit Representations of Meaning in Neural Language Modelscited by 179
  7. 2021Chess as a Testbed for Language Model State Trackingcited by 69
  8. 2022CONDAQA: A Contrastive Reading Comprehension Dataset for Reasoning about Negationcited by 38
  9. 2016Simpler Context-Dependent Logical Forms via Model Projectionscited by 33
  10. 2020It's not a Non-Issue: Negation as a Source of Error in Machine Translationcited by 19

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

4 papers.