mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Active teacher selection for reward learning

arXiv 2310.15288 ↗First posted 23 Oct 2023cs.AI cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reward learning techniques enable machine learning systems to learn objectives from human feedback. A core limitation of these systems is their assumption that all feedback comes from a single human teacher, despite gathering feedback from large and heterogeneous populations. We propose the Hidden Utility Bandit (HUB) framework to model differences in teacher rationality, expertise, and costliness, formalizing the problem of learning from multiple teachers. We develop a variety of solution algorithms and apply them to two real-world domains: paper recommendation systems and COVID-19 vaccine testing. We find that Active Teacher Selection (ATS) algorithms outperform baselines by actively selecting when and which teacher to query. Our key contributions are 1) the HUB framework: a novel mathematical framework for modeling the teacher selection problem, 2) ATS: an active-learning based algorithmic approach that demonstrates the utility of modeling teacher heterogeneity, and 3) proof-of-concept application of the HUB framework and ATS approaches to model and solve multiple real-world problems with complex trade-offs between reward learning and optimization.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2023.

Builds on

19 of 40 references.

References · 19

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
  3. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
  4. 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 759
  5. 2022The Effects of Reward Misspecification: Mapping and Mitigating Misaligned Modelscited by 328
  6. 2016Cooperative Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 300
  7. 2013The Complexity of Decentralized Control of Markov Decision Processescited by 231
  8. 2022Defining and Characterizing Reward Hackingcited by 203
  9. 2020Reward-rational (implicit) choice: A unifying formalism for reward learningcited by 120
  10. 2023When the Majority is Wrong: Modeling Annotator Disagreement for Subjective Taskscited by 90
  11. 2017Online algorithms for POMDPs with continuous state, action, and observation spacescited by 84
  12. 2022Misspecification in Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 27
7 more
  1. 2022On the Sensitivity of Reward Inference to Misspecified Human Modelscited by 25
  2. 2022Humans are not Boltzmann Distributions: Challenges and Opportunities for Modelling Human Feedback and Interaction in Reinforcement Learningcited by 22
  3. 2022The Expertise Problem: Learning from Specialized Feedbackcited by 20
  4. 2018An Efficient, Generalized Bellman Update For Cooperative Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 15
  5. 2019Literal or Pedagogic Human? Analyzing Human Model Misspecification in Objective Learningcited by 15
  6. 2021Choice Set Misspecification in Reward Inferencecited by 13
  7. 2023Active Reward Learning from Multiple Teacherscited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Conservative Bias in Multi-Teacher Learning: Why Agents Prefer Low-Reward Advisors
  2. 2021Iterative Teacher-Aware Learning
  3. 2020Active Imitation Learning from Multiple Non-Deterministic Teachers: Formulation, Challenges, and Algorithms
  4. 2025In Good GRACEs: Principled Teacher Selection for Knowledge Distillation
  5. 2023Guarded Policy Optimization with Imperfect Online Demonstrations
  6. 2026Learning beyond Teacher: Generalized On-Policy Distillation with Reward Extrapolation
  7. 2025What Makes a Reward Model a Good Teacher? An Optimization Perspective
  8. 2026SPOT: Sparse Probing and Outcome Calibration for On-Policy Distillation