Competitive Advantage Attacks to Decentralized Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Decentralized federated learning (DFL) enables clients (e.g., hospitals and banks) to jointly train machine learning models without a central orchestration server. In each global training round, each client trains a local model on its own training data and then they exchange local models for aggregation. In this work, we propose SelfishAttack, a new family of attacks to DFL. In SelfishAttack, a set of selfish clients aim to achieve competitive advantages over the remaining non-selfish ones, i.e., the final learnt local models of the selfish clients are more accurate than those of the non-selfish ones. Towards this goal, the selfish clients send carefully crafted local models to each remaining non-selfish one in each global training round. We formulate finding such local models as an optimization problem and propose methods to solve it when DFL uses different aggregation rules. Theoretically, we show that our methods find the optimal solutions to the optimization problem. Empirically, we show that SelfishAttack successfully increases the accuracy gap (i.e., competitive advantage) between the final learnt local models of selfish clients and those of non-selfish ones. Moreover, SelfishAttack achieves larger accuracy gaps than poisoning attacks when extended to increase competitive advantages.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2023.
Builds on
20 of 38 references.
References · 20
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2018LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settingscited by 792
- 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 765
- 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 711
- 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 493
- 2018Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lenscited by 351
- 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 346
- 2019Robust Aggregation for Federated Learningcited by 317
- 2022FLDetector: Defending Federated Learning Against Model Poisoning Attacks via Detecting Malicious Clientscited by 125
- 2019BrainTorrent: A Peer-to-Peer Environment for Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 117
- 2022DisPFL: Towards Communication-Efficient Personalized Federated Learning via Decentralized Sparse Trainingcited by 74
- 2022MPAF: Model Poisoning Attacks to Federated Learning based on Fake Clientscited by 68
8 more
- 2019BRIDGE: Byzantine-resilient Decentralized Gradient Descentcited by 45
- 2017ByRDiE: Byzantine-resilient distributed coordinate descent for decentralized learningcited by 36
- 2022FLCert: Provably Secure Federated Learning against Poisoning Attackscited by 30
- 2022AFLGuard: Byzantine-robust Asynchronous Federated Learningcited by 29
- 2020Byzantine-resilient Decentralized Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 28
- 2022Byzantine-Resilient Decentralized Stochastic Optimization with Robust Aggregation Rulescited by 23
- 2021Data Poisoning Attacks and Defenses to Crowdsourcing Systemscited by 12
- 2023Backdoor Attacks in Peer-to-Peer Federated Learningcited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.