Provable Benefits of Multi-task RL under Non-Markovian Decision Making Processes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In multi-task reinforcement learning (RL) under Markov decision processes (MDPs), the presence of shared latent structures among multiple MDPs has been shown to yield significant benefits to the sample efficiency compared to single-task RL. In this paper, we investigate whether such a benefit can extend to more general sequential decision making problems, such as partially observable MDPs (POMDPs) and more general predictive state representations (PSRs). The main challenge here is that the large and complex model space makes it hard to identify what types of common latent structure of multi-task PSRs can reduce the model complexity and improve sample efficiency. To this end, we posit a joint model class for tasks and use the notion of η-bracketing number to quantify its complexity; this number also serves as a general metric to capture the similarity of tasks and thus determines the benefit of multi-task over single-task RL. We first study upstream multi-task learning over PSRs, in which all tasks share the same observation and action spaces. We propose a provably efficient algorithm UMT-PSR for finding near-optimal policies for all PSRs, and demonstrate that the advantage of multi-task learning manifests if the joint model class of PSRs has a smaller η-bracketing number compared to that of individual single-task learning. We also provide several example multi-task PSRs with small η-bracketing numbers, which reap the benefits of multi-task learning. We further investigate downstream learning, in which the agent needs to learn a new target task that shares some commonalities with the upstream tasks via a similarity constraint. By exploiting the learned PSRs from the upstream, we develop a sample-efficient algorithm that provably finds a near-optimal policy.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2023.
Builds on
20 of 29 references.
References · 20
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
- 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,173
- 2020CURL: Contrastive Unsupervised Representations for Reinforcement Learningcited by 745
- 2016#Exploration: A Study of Count-Based Exploration for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 307
- 2021The Statistical Complexity of Interactive Decision Makingcited by 208
- 2020Learning Near Optimal Policies with Low Inherent Bellman Errorcited by 180
- 2013Sample Complexity of Multi-task Reinforcement Learningcited by 58
- 2021Near-optimal Representation Learning for Linear Bandits and Linear RLcited by 45
- 2022PAC Reinforcement Learning for Predictive State Representationscited by 42
- 2020Provable Representation Learning for Imitation Learning via Bi-level Optimizationcited by 41
- 2022Provable Benefits of Representational Transfer in Reinforcement Learningcited by 38
- 2022Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning in Partially Observable Dynamical Systemscited by 35
8 more
- 2022Model-based RL with Optimistic Posterior Sampling: Structural Conditions and Sample Complexitycited by 31
- 2021On the Power of Multitask Representation Learning in Linear MDPcited by 30
- 2022Provable Benefit of Multitask Representation Learning in Reinforcement Learningcited by 29
- 2022Partially Observable RL with B-Stability: Unified Structural Condition and Sharp Sample-Efficient Algorithmscited by 24
- 2021Provably Efficient Multi-Task Reinforcement Learning with Model Transfercited by 16
- 2022Provable General Function Class Representation Learning in Multitask Bandits and MDPscited by 12
- 2023Provably Efficient UCB-type Algorithms For Learning Predictive State Representationscited by 6
- 2022Joint Representation Training in Sequential Tasks with Shared Structurecited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.