mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Test-Time Self-Adaptive Small Language Models for Question Answering

arXiv 2310.13307 ↗First posted 20 Oct 2023cs.CL cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent instruction-finetuned large language models (LMs) have achieved notable performances in various tasks, such as question-answering (QA). However, despite their ability to memorize a vast amount of general knowledge across diverse tasks, they might be suboptimal on specific tasks due to their limited capacity to transfer and adapt knowledge to target tasks. Moreover, further finetuning LMs with labeled datasets is often infeasible due to their absence, but it is also questionable if we can transfer smaller LMs having limited knowledge only with unlabeled test data. In this work, we show and investigate the capabilities of smaller self-adaptive LMs, only with unlabeled test data. In particular, we first stochastically generate multiple answers, and then ensemble them while filtering out low-quality samples to mitigate noise from inaccurate labels. Our proposed self-adaption strategy demonstrates significant performance improvements on benchmark QA datasets with higher robustness across diverse prompts, enabling LMs to stay stable. Code is available at: https://github.com/starsuzi/T-SAS.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2023.

Builds on

28 of 35 references.

References · 28

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  3. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  4. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  5. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  6. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  7. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
  8. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  9. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
  10. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
  11. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
  12. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
16 more
  1. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,193
  2. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,100
  3. 2017Crowdsourcing Multiple Choice Science Questionscited by 765
  4. 2022Large Language Models Can Self-Improvecited by 664
  5. 2020TyDi QA: A Benchmark for Information-Seeking Question Answering in Typologically Diverse Languagescited by 488
  6. 2019Revisiting Self-Training for Neural Sequence Generationcited by 155
  7. 2022Prompt Consistency for Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 67
  8. 2020End-to-End Synthetic Data Generation for Domain Adaptation of Question Answering Systemscited by 65
  9. 2023Better Zero-Shot Reasoning with Self-Adaptive Promptingcited by 52
  10. 2021Efficient Test Time Adapter Ensembling for Low-resource Language Varietiescited by 26
  11. 2021Self-Supervised Test-Time Learning for Reading Comprehensioncited by 22
  12. 2020Harvesting and Refining Question-Answer Pairs for Unsupervised QAcited by 20
  13. 2023Discrete Prompt Optimization via Constrained Generation for Zero-shot Re-rankercited by 20
  14. 2023Evaluating the Robustness of Discrete Promptscited by 18
  15. 2023Robust Question Answering against Distribution Shifts with Test-Time Adaptation: An Empirical Studycited by 8
  16. 2023ZARA: Improving Few-Shot Self-Rationalization for Small Language Modelscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

7 papers.