mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

NameGuess: Column Name Expansion for Tabular Data

arXiv 2310.13196 ↗First posted 19 Oct 2023cs.CL cs.DB cs.LGcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in large language models have revolutionized many sectors, including the database industry. One common challenge when dealing with large volumes of tabular data is the pervasive use of abbreviated column names, which can negatively impact performance on various data search, access, and understanding tasks. To address this issue, we introduce a new task, called NameGuess, to expand column names (used in database schema) as a natural language generation problem. We create a training dataset of 384K abbreviated-expanded column pairs using a new data fabrication method and a human-annotated evaluation benchmark that includes 9.2K examples from real-world tables. To tackle the complexities associated with polysemy and ambiguity in NameGuess, we enhance auto-regressive language models by conditioning on table content and column header names -- yielding a fine-tuned model (with 2.7B parameters) that matches human performance. Furthermore, we conduct a comprehensive analysis (on multiple LLMs) to validate the effectiveness of table content in NameGuess and identify promising future opportunities. Code has been made available at https://github.com/amazon-science/nameguess.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2023.

Builds on

26 of 48 references.

References · 26

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  5. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  6. 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,139
  7. 2017Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learningcited by 687
  8. 2020It's Not Just Size That Matters: Small Language Models Are Also Few-Shot Learnerscited by 669
  9. 2020TAPAS: Weakly Supervised Table Parsing via Pre-trainingcited by 434
  10. 2020Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamicscited by 425
  11. 2020TaBERT: Pretraining for Joint Understanding of Textual and Tabular Datacited by 398
  12. 2021Understanding Dataset Difficulty with V-Usable Informationcited by 291
14 more
  1. 2022UnifiedSKG: Unifying and Multi-Tasking Structured Knowledge Grounding with Text-to-Text Language Modelscited by 231
  2. 2021TABBIE: Pretrained Representations of Tabular Datacited by 111
  3. 2022TableFormer: Robust Transformer Modeling for Table-Text Encodingcited by 91
  4. 2020Few-Shot Text Generation with Pattern-Exploiting Trainingcited by 87
  5. 2019Sherlock: A Deep Learning Approach to Semantic Data Type Detectioncited by 74
  6. 2021MATE: Multi-view Attention for Table Transformer Efficiencycited by 54
  7. 2021GitTables: A Large-Scale Corpus of Relational Tablescited by 45
  8. 2022Table Pre-training: A Survey on Model Architectures, Pre-training Objectives, and Downstream Taskscited by 42
  9. 2020Valentine: Evaluating Matching Techniques for Dataset Discoverycited by 35
  10. 2020What Does This Acronym Mean? Introducing a New Dataset for Acronym Identification and Disambiguationcited by 26
  11. 2021TCN: Table Convolutional Network for Web Table Interpretationcited by 24
  12. 2021FORTAP: Using Formulas for Numerical-Reasoning-Aware Table Pretrainingcited by 19
  13. 2021Structured abbreviation expansion in contextcited by 9
  14. 2022PLOD: An Abbreviation Detection Dataset for Scientific Documentscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 7.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: