mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

OODRobustBench: a Benchmark and Large-Scale Analysis of Adversarial Robustness under Distribution Shift

arXiv 2310.12793 ↗First posted 19 Oct 2023cs.LG cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing works have made great progress in improving adversarial robustness, but typically test their method only on data from the same distribution as the training data, i.e. in-distribution (ID) testing. As a result, it is unclear how such robustness generalizes under input distribution shifts, i.e. out-of-distribution (OOD) testing. This omission is concerning as such distribution shifts are unavoidable when methods are deployed in the wild. To address this issue we propose a benchmark named OODRobustBench to comprehensively assess OOD adversarial robustness using 23 dataset-wise shifts (i.e. naturalistic shifts in input distribution) and 6 threat-wise shifts (i.e., unforeseen adversarial threat models). OODRobustBench is used to assess 706 robust models using 60.7K adversarial evaluations. This large-scale analysis shows that: 1) adversarial robustness suffers from a severe OOD generalization issue; 2) ID robustness correlates strongly with OOD robustness in a positive linear way. The latter enables the prediction of OOD robustness from ID robustness. We then predict and verify that existing methods are unlikely to achieve high OOD robustness. Novel methods are therefore required to achieve OOD robustness beyond our prediction. To facilitate the development of these methods, we investigate a wide range of techniques and identify several promising directions. Code and models are available at: https://github.com/OODRobustBench/OODRobustBench.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 83 of its 97 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2023.

Builds on

83 of 97 references.

References · 83

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
  5. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  6. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  7. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  8. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  9. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  10. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
  11. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  12. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
38 more
  1. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
  2. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  3. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  4. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  5. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
  6. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
  7. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
  8. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  9. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
  10. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
  11. 2020Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)cited by 737
  12. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
  13. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
  14. 2017Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformationscited by 517
  15. 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 504
  16. 2020Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 452
  17. 2017Deep Layer Aggregationcited by 436
  18. 2021Towards Out-Of-Distribution Generalization: A Surveycited by 431
  19. 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 415
  20. 2018Defense-GAN: Protecting Classifiers Against Adversarial Attacks Using Generative Modelscited by 362
  21. 2020Uncovering the Limits of Adversarial Training against Norm-Bounded Adversarial Examplescited by 275
  22. 2021Accuracy on the Line: On the Strong Correlation Between Out-of-Distribution and In-Distribution Generalizationcited by 248
  23. 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 242
  24. 2021Improving Robustness using Generated Datacited by 233
  25. 2021TrivialAugment: Tuning-free Yet State-of-the-Art Data Augmentationcited by 225
  26. 2023Better Diffusion Models Further Improve Adversarial Trainingcited by 207
  27. 2021Fixing Data Augmentation to Improve Adversarial Robustnesscited by 201
  28. 2022Patches Are All You Need?cited by 201
  29. 2018Do CIFAR-10 Classifiers Generalize to CIFAR-10?cited by 197
  30. 2018Spatially Transformed Adversarial Examplescited by 195
  31. 2019Adversarial Training and Robustness for Multiple Perturbationscited by 182
  32. 2018MMA Training: Direct Input Space Margin Maximization through Adversarial Trainingcited by 171
  33. 2020Robust Pre-Training by Adversarial Contrastive Learningcited by 144
  34. 2022Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performancecited by 141
  35. 2020Perceptual Adversarial Robustness: Defense Against Unseen Threat Modelscited by 137
  36. 2019Adversarial Examples Are a Natural Consequence of Test Error in Noisecited by 114
  37. 2021Robust Learning Meets Generative Models: Can Proxy Distributions Improve Adversarial Robustness?cited by 113
  38. 2018Decoupling Direction and Norm for Efficient Gradient-Based L2 Adversarial Attacks and Defensescited by 109

50 most cited of 83 All 83 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.