mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Canonical normalizing flows for manifold learning

arXiv 2310.12743 ↗First posted 19 Oct 2023stat.ML cs.LG math.DGcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Manifold learning flows are a class of generative modelling techniques that assume a low-dimensional manifold description of the data. The embedding of such a manifold into the high-dimensional space of the data is achieved via learnable invertible transformations. Therefore, once the manifold is properly aligned via a reconstruction loss, the probability density is tractable on the manifold and maximum likelihood can be used to optimize the network parameters. Naturally, the lower-dimensional representation of the data requires an injective-mapping. Recent approaches were able to enforce that the density aligns with the modelled manifold, while efficiently calculating the density volume-change term when embedding to the higher-dimensional space. However, unless the injective-mapping is analytically predefined, the learned manifold is not necessarily an efficient representation of the data. Namely, the latent dimensions of such models frequently learn an entangled intrinsic basis, with degenerate information being stored in each dimension. Alternatively, if a locally orthogonal and/or sparse basis is to be learned, here coined canonical intrinsic basis, it can serve in learning a more compact latent space representation. Toward this end, we propose a canonical manifold learning flow method, where a novel optimization objective enforces the transformation matrix to have few prominent and non-degenerate basis functions. We demonstrate that by minimizing the off-diagonal manifold metric elements ℓ1-norm, we can achieve such a basis, which is simultaneously sparse and/or orthogonal. Canonical manifold flow yields a more efficient use of the latent space, automatically generating fewer prominent and distinct dimensions to represent data, and a better approximation of target distributions than other manifold flow methods in most experiments we conducted, resulting in lower FID scores.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2023.

Builds on

19 of 35 references.

References · 19

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
  2. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
  3. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,042
  4. 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,323
  5. 2014NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimationcited by 1,058
  6. 2017Masked Autoregressive Flow for Density Estimationcited by 684
  7. 2019Diagnosing and Enhancing VAE Modelscited by 193
  8. 2019Topological Autoencoderscited by 127
  9. 2020Flows for simultaneous manifold learning and density estimationcited by 118
  10. 2020Normalizing Flows on Tori and Spherescited by 117
  11. 2021Rectangular Flows for Manifold Learningcited by 50
  12. 2020Learning Flat Latent Manifolds with VAEscited by 33
7 more
  1. 2023TANGOS: Regularizing Tabular Neural Networks through Gradient Orthogonalization and Specializationcited by 32
  2. 2021Tractable Density Estimation on Learned Manifolds with Conformal Embedding Flowscited by 31
  3. 2013Variational Relevance Vector Machinescited by 21
  4. 2021Principal Component Density Estimation for Scenario Generation Using Normalizing Flowscited by 10
  5. 2020Representing Deep Neural Networks Latent Space Geometries with Graphscited by 7
  6. 2018Sparse PCA from Sparse Linear Regressioncited by 6
  7. 2022Nonlinear Isometric Manifold Learning for Injective Normalizing Flowscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 6; 2025: 5; 2026: 4.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: