Lost in Translation: When GPT-4V(ision) Can't See Eye to Eye with Text. A Vision-Language-Consistency Analysis of VLLMs and Beyond
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advancements in multimodal techniques open exciting possibilities for models excelling in diverse tasks involving text, audio, and image processing. Models like GPT-4V, blending computer vision and language modeling, excel in complex text and image tasks. Numerous prior research endeavors have diligently examined the performance of these Vision Large Language Models (VLLMs) across tasks like object detection, image captioning and others. However, these analyses often focus on evaluating the performance of each modality in isolation, lacking insights into their cross-modal interactions. Specifically, questions concerning whether these vision-language models execute vision and language tasks consistently or independently have remained unanswered. In this study, we draw inspiration from recent investigations into multilingualism and conduct a comprehensive analysis of model's cross-modal interactions. We introduce a systematic framework that quantifies the capability disparities between different modalities in the multi-modal setting and provide a set of datasets designed for these evaluations. Our findings reveal that models like GPT-4V tend to perform consistently modalities when the tasks are relatively simple. However, the trustworthiness of results derived from the vision modality diminishes as the tasks become more challenging. Expanding on our findings, we introduce "Vision Description Prompting," a method that effectively improves performance in challenging vision-related tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2023.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Holistic Analysis of Hallucination in GPT-4V(ision): Bias and Interference Challengescited by 131
- 2024Polymath: A Challenging Multi-modal Mathematical Reasoning Benchmarkcited by 22
- 2025Generalizing from SIMPLE to HARD Visual Reasoning: Can We Mitigate Modality Imbalance in VLMs?cited by 14
- 2023GPT-4V(ision) as A Social Media Analysis Enginecited by 6
- 2025Generalizing from SIMPLE to HARD Visual Reasoning: Can We Mitigate Modality Imbalance in VLMs?5 Jan 2025
- 2024Polymath: A Challenging Multi-modal Mathematical Reasoning Benchmark6 Oct 2024
- 2023GPT-4V(ision) as A Social Media Analysis Engine13 Nov 2023
- 2023Holistic Analysis of Hallucination in GPT-4V(ision): Bias and Interference Challenges6 Nov 2023
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Cross-Modal Consistency in Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2023The Dawn of LMMs: Preliminary Explorations with GPT-4V(ision)
- 2024Putting GPT-4o to the Sword: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Language, Vision, Speech, and Multimodal Proficiency
- 2023GPT-4V(ision) as a Generalist Evaluator for Vision-Language Tasks
- 2024Exploring the Frontier of Vision-Language Models: A Survey of Current Methodologies and Future Directions
- 2025Words or Vision: Do Vision-Language Models Have Blind Faith in Text?
- 2024Constructing Multilingual Visual-Text Datasets Revealing Visual Multilingual Ability of Vision Language Models
- 2023Large Multimodal Models: Notes on CVPR 2023 Tutorial