Pseudointelligence: A Unifying Framework for Language Model Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With large language models surpassing human performance on an increasing number of benchmarks, we must take a principled approach for targeted evaluation of model capabilities. Inspired by pseudorandomness, we propose pseudointelligence, which captures the maxim that "(perceived) intelligence lies in the eye of the beholder". That is, that claims of intelligence are meaningful only when their evaluator is taken into account. Concretely, we propose a complexity-theoretic framework of model evaluation cast as a dynamic interaction between a model and a learned evaluator. We demonstrate that this framework can be used to reason about two case studies in language model evaluation, as well as analyze existing evaluation methods.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2023.
Builds on
17 of 35 references.
References · 17
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,856
- 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
- 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 1,006
- 2022Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluationscited by 836
- 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 807
- 2017Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 571
- 2021Dynabench: Rethinking Benchmarking in NLPcited by 459
- 2022Self-critiquing models for assisting human evaluatorscited by 380
- 2021AI and the Everything in the Whole Wide World Benchmarkcited by 349
- 2020Beat the AI: Investigating Adversarial Human Annotation for Reading Comprehensioncited by 131
5 more
- 2021Memorization vs. Generalization: Quantifying Data Leakage in NLP Performance Evaluationcited by 70
- 2014Optimal Learners for Multiclass Problemscited by 65
- 2022Evaluation Gaps in Machine Learning Practicecited by 49
- 2021Models in the Loop: Aiding Crowdworkers with Generative Annotation Assistantscited by 31
- 2022A Theory of Dynamic Benchmarkscited by 16
Built on by
Not cited yet.