mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Online Convex Optimization with Switching Cost and Delayed Gradients

arXiv 2310.11880 ↗First posted 18 Oct 2023cs.LG math.OC stat.MLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the online convex optimization (OCO) problem with quadratic and linear switching cost in the limited information setting, where an online algorithm can choose its action using only gradient information about the previous objective function. For L-smooth and μ-strongly convex objective functions, we propose an online multiple gradient descent (OMGD) algorithm and show that its competitive ratio for the OCO problem with quadratic switching cost is at most 4(L + 5) + frac16(L + 5)μ. The competitive ratio upper bound for OMGD is also shown to be order-wise tight in terms of L,μ. In addition, we show that the competitive ratio of any online algorithm is maxOmega(L), Omega(fracL√μ) in the limited information setting when the switching cost is quadratic. We also show that the OMGD algorithm achieves the optimal (order-wise) dynamic regret in the limited information setting. For the linear switching cost, the competitive ratio upper bound of the OMGD algorithm is shown to depend on both the path length and the squared path length of the problem instance, in addition to L, μ, and is shown to be order-wise, the best competitive ratio any online algorithm can achieve. Consequently, we conclude that the optimal competitive ratio for the quadratic and linear switching costs are fundamentally different in the limited information setting.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2023.

Builds on

19 of 34 references.

References · 19

  1. 2013Non-stationary Stochastic Optimizationcited by 173
  2. 2015Online Optimization : Competing with Dynamic Comparatorscited by 99
  3. 2016Tracking Slowly Moving Clairvoyant: Optimal Dynamic Regret of Online Learning with True and Noisy Gradientcited by 65
  4. 2016Improved Dynamic Regret for Non-degenerate Functionscited by 46
  5. 2013Dynamical Models and Tracking Regret in Online Convex Programmingcited by 42
  6. 2019Bandit Convex Optimization in Non-stationary Environmentscited by 41
  7. 2018Smoothed Online Convex Optimization in High Dimensions via Online Balanced Descentcited by 33
  8. 2020Improved Analysis for Dynamic Regret of Strongly Convex and Smooth Functionscited by 33
  9. 2019Beyond Online Balanced Descent: An Optimal Algorithm for Smoothed Online Optimizationcited by 31
  10. 2020Minimizing Dynamic Regret and Adaptive Regret Simultaneouslycited by 30
  11. 2021Revisiting Smoothed Online Learningcited by 29
  12. 2018Online Optimization with Predictions and Switching Costs: Fast Algorithms and the Fundamental Limitcited by 27
7 more
  1. 2018Smoothed Online Optimization for Regression and Controlcited by 26
  2. 2017Bandit Convex Optimization for Scalable and Dynamic IoT Managementcited by 24
  3. 2015A Tale of Two Metrics: Simultaneous Bounds on Competitiveness and Regretcited by 17
  4. 2021Simultaneously Achieving Sublinear Regret and Constraint Violations for Online Convex Optimization with Time-varying Constraintscited by 12
  5. 2020Dimension-Free Bounds on Chasing Convex Functionscited by 8
  6. 2018Optimal Algorithms for Right-Sizing Data Centers- Extended Versioncited by 6
  7. 2023On Dynamic Regret and Constraint Violations in Constrained Online Convex Optimizationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.