Tight Time-Space Lower Bounds for Constant-Pass Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In his breakthrough paper, Raz showed that any parity learning algorithm requires either quadratic memory or an exponential number of samples [FOCS'16, JACM'19]. A line of work that followed extended this result to a large class of learning problems. Until recently, all these results considered learning in the streaming model, where each sample is drawn independently, and the learner is allowed a single pass over the stream of samples. Garg, Raz, and Tal [CCC'19] considered a stronger model, allowing multiple passes over the stream. In the 2-pass model, they showed that learning parities of size n requires either a memory of size n1.5 or at least 2^√n samples. (Their result also generalizes to other learning problems.) In this work, for any constant q, we prove tight memory-sample lower bounds for any parity learning algorithm that makes q passes over the stream of samples. We show that such a learner requires either Omega(n2) memory size or at least 2Omega(n) samples. Beyond establishing a tight lower bound, this is the first non-trivial lower bound for q-pass learning for any q≥ 3. Similar to prior work, our results extend to any learning problem with many nearly-orthogonal concepts. We complement the lower bound with an upper bound, showing that parity learning with q passes can be done efficiently with O(n2/log q) memory.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2023.
Builds on
11 of 21 references.
References · 11
- 2016Fast Learning Requires Good Memory: A Time-Space Lower Bound for Parity Learningcited by 32
- 2013Fundamental Limits of Online and Distributed Algorithms for Statistical Learning and Estimationcited by 23
- 2019Memory-Sample Tradeoffs for Linear Regression with Small Errorcited by 22
- 2018Detecting Correlations with Little Memory and Communicationcited by 19
- 2017Extractor-Based Time-Space Lower Bounds for Learningcited by 18
- 2019Space lower bounds for linear prediction in the streaming modelcited by 14
- 2022Efficient Convex Optimization Requires Superlinear Memorycited by 14
- 2020Towards a combinatorial characterization of bounded memory learningcited by 9
- 2021Memory-Sample Lower Bounds for Learning Parity with Noisecited by 8
- 2020Time-Space Tradeoffs for Distinguishing Distributions and Applications to Security of Goldreich's PRGcited by 3
- 2017Mixing Complexity and its Applications to Neural Networkscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.