mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Generalized Robust Test-Time Adaptation in Continuous Dynamic Scenarios

arXiv 2310.04714 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2023cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Test-time adaptation (TTA) adapts the pre-trained models to test distributions during the inference phase exclusively employing unlabeled test data streams, which holds great value for the deployment of models in real-world applications. Numerous studies have achieved promising performance on simplistic test streams, characterized by independently and uniformly sampled test data originating from a fixed target data distribution. However, these methods frequently prove ineffective in practical scenarios, where both continual covariate shift and continual label shift occur simultaneously, i.e., data and label distributions change concurrently and continually over time. In this study, a more challenging Practical Test-Time Adaptation (PTTA) setup is introduced, which takes into account the concurrent presence of continual covariate shift and continual label shift, and we propose a Generalized Robust Test-Time Adaptation (GRoTTA) method to effectively address the difficult problem. We start by steadily adapting the model through Robust Parameter Adaptation to make balanced predictions for test samples. To be specific, firstly, the effects of continual label shift are eliminated by enforcing the model to learn from a uniform label distribution and introducing recalibration of batch normalization to ensure stability. Secondly, the continual covariate shift is alleviated by employing a source knowledge regularization with the teacher-student model to update parameters. Considering the potential information in the test stream, we further refine the balanced predictions by Bias-Guided Output Adaptation, which exploits latent structure in the feature space and is adaptive to the imbalanced label distribution. Extensive experiments demonstrate GRoTTA outperforms the existing competitors by a large margin under PTTA setting, rendering it highly conducive for adoption in real-world applications.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 55 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2023.

Builds on

55 of 73 references.

References · 55

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  5. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  6. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  7. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  8. 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,410
  9. 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,239
  10. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  11. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
  12. 2021SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformerscited by 2,923
38 more
  1. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  2. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
  3. 2018Unsupervised Representation Learning by Predicting Image Rotationscited by 1,586
  4. 2018Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 1,327
  5. 2017Deep Hashing Network for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 1,181
  6. 2017Deeper, Broader and Artier Domain Generalizationcited by 983
  7. 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 844
  8. 2021Generalizing to Unseen Domains: A Survey on Domain Generalizationcited by 762
  9. 2021Domain Generalization: A Surveycited by 760
  10. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
  11. 2018Deep Visual Domain Adaptation: A Surveycited by 634
  12. 2013Domain Generalization via Invariant Feature Representationcited by 622
  13. 2021Domain Generalization with MixStylecited by 563
  14. 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 520
  15. 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 467
  16. 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 427
  17. 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 409
  18. 2022Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Modelscited by 379
  19. 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 376
  20. 2019Bridging Theory and Algorithm for Domain Adaptationcited by 332
  21. 2022Contrastive Test-Time Adaptationcited by 258
  22. 2020Evaluating Prediction-Time Batch Normalization for Robustness under Covariate Shiftcited by 235
  23. 2020Universal Source-Free Domain Adaptationcited by 219
  24. 2022Test-Time Training with Masked Autoencoderscited by 208
  25. 2023Robust Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Scenarioscited by 185
  26. 2022Parameter-free Online Test-time Adaptationcited by 184
  27. 2021Exploiting the Intrinsic Neighborhood Structure for Source-free Domain Adaptationcited by 176
  28. 2021Generalized Source-free Domain Adaptationcited by 175
  29. 2020Source Data-absent Unsupervised Domain Adaptation through Hypothesis Transfer and Labeling Transfercited by 173
  30. 2023EcoTTA: Memory-Efficient Continual Test-time Adaptation via Self-distilled Regularizationcited by 123
  31. 2022Robust Mean Teacher for Continual and Gradual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 102
  32. 2022Test-Time Adaptation via Conjugate Pseudo-labelscited by 98
  33. 2022Visual Prompt Tuning for Test-time Domain Adaptationcited by 97
  34. 2023DELTA: degradation-free fully test-time adaptationcited by 72
  35. 2022Test-Time Adaptation via Self-Training with Nearest Neighbor Informationcited by 64
  36. 2022Revisiting Realistic Test-Time Training: Sequential Inference and Adaptation by Anchored Clusteringcited by 44
  37. 2021Test-Time Personalization with a Transformer for Human Pose Estimationcited by 33
  38. 2022TTTFlow: Unsupervised Test-Time Training with Normalizing Flowcited by 33

50 most cited of 55 All 55 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.