A Learnable Counter-condition Analysis Framework for Functional Connectivity-based Neurological Disorder Diagnosis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
To understand the biological characteristics of neurological disorders with functional connectivity (FC), recent studies have widely utilized deep learning-based models to identify the disease and conducted post-hoc analyses via explainable models to discover disease-related biomarkers. Most existing frameworks consist of three stages, namely, feature selection, feature extraction for classification, and analysis, where each stage is implemented separately. However, if the results at each stage lack reliability, it can cause misdiagnosis and incorrect analysis in afterward stages. In this study, we propose a novel unified framework that systemically integrates diagnoses (i.e., feature selection and feature extraction) and explanations. Notably, we devised an adaptive attention network as a feature selection approach to identify individual-specific disease-related connections. We also propose a functional network relational encoder that summarizes the global topological properties of FC by learning the inter-network relations without pre-defined edges between functional networks. Last but not least, our framework provides a novel explanatory power for neuroscientific interpretation, also termed counter-condition analysis. We simulated the FC that reverses the diagnostic information (i.e., counter-condition FC): converting a normal brain to be abnormal and vice versa. We validated the effectiveness of our framework by using two large resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) datasets, Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange (ABIDE) and REST-meta-MDD, and demonstrated that our framework outperforms other competing methods for disease identification. Furthermore, we analyzed the disease-related neurological patterns based on counter-condition analysis.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2023.
Builds on
14 of 57 references.
References · 14
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
- 2017The (Un)reliability of saliency methodscited by 333
- 2018Robust Classification with Convolutional Prototype Learningcited by 123
- 2021Learning Dynamic Graph Representation of Brain Connectome with Spatio-Temporal Attentioncited by 87
- 2016Neural Encoding and Decoding with Deep Learning for Dynamic Natural Visioncited by 60
- 2020How Does Selective Mechanism Improve Self-Attention Networks?cited by 19
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.