Accelerated Neural Network Training with Rooted Logistic Objectives
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many neural networks deployed in the real world scenarios are trained using cross entropy based loss functions. From the optimization perspective, it is known that the behavior of first order methods such as gradient descent crucially depend on the separability of datasets. In fact, even in the most simplest case of binary classification, the rate of convergence depends on two factors: (1) condition number of data matrix, and (2) separability of the dataset. With no further pre-processing techniques such as over-parametrization, data augmentation etc., separability is an intrinsic quantity of the data distribution under consideration. We focus on the landscape design of the logistic function and derive a novel sequence of em strictly convex functions that are at least as strict as logistic loss. The minimizers of these functions coincide with those of the minimum norm solution wherever possible. The strict convexity of the derived function can be extended to finetune state-of-the-art models and applications. In empirical experimental analysis, we apply our proposed rooted logistic objective to multiple deep models, e.g., fully-connected neural networks and transformers, on various of classification benchmarks. Our results illustrate that training with rooted loss function is converged faster and gains performance improvements. Furthermore, we illustrate applications of our novel rooted loss function in generative modeling based downstream applications, such as finetuning StyleGAN model with the rooted loss. The code implementing our losses and models can be found here for open source software development purposes: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/rootedloss.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2023.
Builds on
32 of 53 references.
References · 32
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
- 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 6,013
- 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,588
- 2018Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesiscited by 2,626
- 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
- 2015Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 2,054
- 2020Training Generative Adversarial Networks with Limited Datacited by 1,186
20 more
- 2019On the Convergence of Adam and Beyondcited by 841
- 2018Gradient Descent Provably Optimizes Over-parameterized Neural Networkscited by 659
- 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 655
- 2020Image Augmentation Is All You Need: Regularizing Deep Reinforcement Learning from Pixelscited by 585
- 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 443
- 2023Sophia: A Scalable Stochastic Second-order Optimizer for Language Model Pre-trainingcited by 265
- 2017Generalization and Equilibrium in Generative Adversarial Nets (GANs)cited by 166
- 2018Risk and parameter convergence of logistic regressioncited by 85
- 2018A modern maximum-likelihood theory for high-dimensional logistic regressioncited by 81
- 2023Transformers as Support Vector Machinescited by 74
- 2020Sparse Regression at Scale: Branch-and-Bound rooted in First-Order Optimizationcited by 45
- 2019Stochastic First-order Methods for Convex and Nonconvex Functional Constrained Optimizationcited by 38
- 2017Loss-Sensitive Generative Adversarial Networks on Lipschitz Densitiescited by 29
- 2020Gradient Methods Never Overfit On Separable Datacited by 29
- 2020Generalization Error of Generalized Linear Models in High Dimensionscited by 25
- 2021Gradient Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 25
- 2023Cut your Losses with Squentropycited by 6
- 2018Condition Number Analysis of Logistic Regression, and its Implications for Standard First-Order Solution Methodscited by 5
- 2023Near-optimal learning with average H"older smoothnesscited by 4
- 2023On Regularized Sparse Logistic Regressioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.