mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Ablation Study to Clarify the Mechanism of Object Segmentation in Multi-Object Representation Learning

arXiv 2310.03273 ↗First posted 5 Oct 2023cs.CV cs.LG eess.IVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-object representation learning aims to represent complex real-world visual input using the composition of multiple objects. Representation learning methods have often used unsupervised learning to segment an input image into individual objects and encode these objects into each latent vector. However, it is not clear how previous methods have achieved the appropriate segmentation of individual objects. Additionally, most of the previous methods regularize the latent vectors using a Variational Autoencoder (VAE). Therefore, it is not clear whether VAE regularization contributes to appropriate object segmentation. To elucidate the mechanism of object segmentation in multi-object representation learning, we conducted an ablation study on MONet, which is a typical method. MONet represents multiple objects using pairs that consist of an attention mask and the latent vector corresponding to the attention mask. Each latent vector is encoded from the input image and attention mask. Then, the component image and attention mask are decoded from each latent vector. The loss function of MONet consists of 1) the sum of reconstruction losses between the input image and decoded component image, 2) the VAE regularization loss of the latent vector, and 3) the reconstruction loss of the attention mask to explicitly encode shape information. We conducted an ablation study on these three loss functions to investigate the effect on segmentation performance. Our results showed that the VAE regularization loss did not affect segmentation performance and the others losses did affect it. Based on this result, we hypothesize that it is important to maximize the attention mask of the image region best represented by a single latent vector corresponding to the attention mask. We confirmed this hypothesis by evaluating a new loss function with the same mechanism as the hypothesis.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2023.

Builds on

13 of 22 references.

References · 13

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  4. 2020Object-Centric Learning with Slot Attentioncited by 865
  5. 2018Invariant Information Clustering for Unsupervised Image Classification and Segmentationcited by 454
  6. 2019MONet: Unsupervised Scene Decomposition and Representationcited by 388
  7. 2019Multi-Object Representation Learning with Iterative Variational Inferencecited by 359
  8. 2019GENESIS: Generative Scene Inference and Sampling with Object-Centric Latent Representationscited by 227
  9. 2020SPACE: Unsupervised Object-Oriented Scene Representation via Spatial Attention and Decompositioncited by 190
  10. 2021GENESIS-V2: Inferring Unordered Object Representations without Iterative Refinementcited by 109
  11. 2020Benchmarking Unsupervised Object Representations for Video Sequencescited by 27
  12. 2022Compositional Scene Representation Learning via Reconstruction: A Surveycited by 27
1 more
  1. 2020Reconstruction Bottlenecks in Object-Centric Generative Modelscited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.