mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Exploring the Impact of Disrupted Peer-to-Peer Communications on Fully Decentralized Learning in Disaster Scenarios

arXiv 2310.02986 ↗First posted 4 Oct 2023cs.LG cs.AI cs.SIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fully decentralized learning enables the distribution of learning resources and decision-making capabilities across multiple user devices or nodes, and is rapidly gaining popularity due to its privacy-preserving and decentralized nature. Importantly, this crowdsourcing of the learning process allows the system to continue functioning even if some nodes are affected or disconnected. In a disaster scenario, communication infrastructure and centralized systems may be disrupted or completely unavailable, hindering the possibility of carrying out standard centralized learning tasks in these settings. Thus, fully decentralized learning can help in this case. However, transitioning from centralized to peer-to-peer communications introduces a dependency between the learning process and the topology of the communication graph among nodes. In a disaster scenario, even peer-to-peer communications are susceptible to abrupt changes, such as devices running out of battery or getting disconnected from others due to their position. In this study, we investigate the effects of various disruptions to peer-to-peer communications on decentralized learning in a disaster setting. We examine the resilience of a decentralized learning process when a subset of devices drop from the process abruptly. To this end, we analyze the difference between losing devices holding data, i.e., potential knowledge, vs. devices contributing only to the graph connectivity, i.e., with no data. Our findings on a Barabasi-Albert graph topology, where training data is distributed across nodes in an IID fashion, indicate that the accuracy of the learning process is more affected by a loss of connectivity than by a loss of data. Nevertheless, the network remains relatively robust, and the learning process can achieve a good level of accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2023.

Builds on

7 of 13 references.

References · 7

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
  3. 2019BrainTorrent: A Peer-to-Peer Environment for Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 117
  4. 2021Decentralized Federated Averagingcited by 114
  5. 2019Federated Learning with Cooperating Devices: A Consensus Approach for Massive IoT Networkscited by 79
  6. 2021Opportunistic Federated Learning: An Exploration of Egocentric Collaboration for Pervasive Computing Applicationscited by 11
  7. 2023The effect of network topologies on fully decentralized learning: a preliminary investigationcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2.

3 papers.