The effect of network topologies on fully decentralized learning: a preliminary investigation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In a decentralized machine learning system, data is typically partitioned among multiple devices or nodes, each of which trains a local model using its own data. These local models are then shared and combined to create a global model that can make accurate predictions on new data. In this paper, we start exploring the role of the network topology connecting nodes on the performance of a Machine Learning model trained through direct collaboration between nodes. We investigate how different types of topologies impact the "spreading of knowledge", i.e., the ability of nodes to incorporate in their local model the knowledge derived by learning patterns in data available in other nodes across the networks. Specifically, we highlight the different roles in this process of more or less connected nodes (hubs and leaves), as well as that of macroscopic network properties (primarily, degree distribution and modularity). Among others, we show that, while it is known that even weak connectivity among network components is sufficient for information spread, it may not be sufficient for knowledge spread. More intuitively, we also find that hubs have a more significant role than leaves in spreading knowledge, although this manifests itself not only for heavy-tailed distributions but also when "hubs" have only moderately more connections than leaves. Finally, we show that tightly knit communities severely hinder knowledge spread.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 8 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2023.
Builds on
6 of 8 references.
References · 6
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2019BrainTorrent: A Peer-to-Peer Environment for Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 115
- 2021Decentralized Federated Averagingcited by 114
- 2019Federated Learning with Cooperating Devices: A Consensus Approach for Massive IoT Networkscited by 79
- 2019A Review of Stochastic Block Models and Extensions for Graph Clusteringcited by 46
- 2019Decentralized Bayesian Learning over Graphscited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 2.
7 papers.
- 2024Impact of network topology on the performance of Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 7
- 2023Coordination-free Decentralised Federated Learning on Complex Networks: Overcoming Heterogeneitycited by 6
- 2024Robustness of Decentralised Learning to Nodes and Data Disruptioncited by 5
- 2023Exploring the Impact of Disrupted Peer-to-Peer Communications on Fully Decentralized Learning in Disaster Scenarioscited by 3
- 2024Initialisation and Network Effects in Decentralised Federated Learningcited by 2
- 2025Topology-Aware Knowledge Propagation in Decentralized Learningcited by 0
- 2025Efficiency Boost in Decentralized Optimization: Reimagining Neighborhood Aggregation with Minimal Overheadcited by 0
- 2025Efficiency Boost in Decentralized Optimization: Reimagining Neighborhood Aggregation with Minimal Overhead26 Sep 2025
- 2025Topology-Aware Knowledge Propagation in Decentralized Learning16 May 2025
- 2024Robustness of Decentralised Learning to Nodes and Data Disruption3 May 2024
- 2024Initialisation and Network Effects in Decentralised Federated Learning23 Mar 2024
- 2024Impact of network topology on the performance of Decentralized Federated Learning28 Feb 2024
- 2023Coordination-free Decentralised Federated Learning on Complex Networks: Overcoming Heterogeneity7 Dec 2023
- 2023Exploring the Impact of Disrupted Peer-to-Peer Communications on Fully Decentralized Learning in Disaster Scenarios4 Oct 2023