mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Prioritized Soft Q-Decomposition for Lexicographic Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2310.02360 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2023cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning (RL) for complex tasks remains a challenge, primarily due to the difficulties of engineering scalar reward functions and the inherent inefficiency of training models from scratch. Instead, it would be better to specify complex tasks in terms of elementary subtasks and to reuse subtask solutions whenever possible. In this work, we address continuous space lexicographic multi-objective RL problems, consisting of prioritized subtasks, which are notoriously difficult to solve. We show that these can be scalarized with a subtask transformation and then solved incrementally using value decomposition. Exploiting this insight, we propose prioritized soft Q-decomposition (PSQD), a novel algorithm for learning and adapting subtask solutions under lexicographic priorities in continuous state-action spaces. PSQD offers the ability to reuse previously learned subtask solutions in a zero-shot composition, followed by an adaptation step. Its ability to use retained subtask training data for offline learning eliminates the need for new environment interaction during adaptation. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach by presenting successful learning, reuse, and adaptation results for both low- and high-dimensional simulated robot control tasks, as well as offline learning results. In contrast to baseline approaches, PSQD does not trade off between conflicting subtasks or priority constraints and satisfies subtask priorities during learning. PSQD provides an intuitive framework for tackling complex RL problems, offering insights into the inner workings of the subtask composition.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2023.

Builds on

22 of 44 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,897
  3. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
  4. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
  5. 2018Soft Actor-Critic Algorithms and Applicationscited by 1,240
  6. 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 983
  7. 2017Reinforcement Learning with Deep Energy-Based Policiescited by 669
  8. 2018Reward Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 417
  9. 2015Risk-Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Percentile Risk Criteriacited by 337
  10. 2021A Practical Guide to Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Planningcited by 256
  11. 2014A Survey of Multi-Objective Sequential Decision-Makingcited by 242
  12. 2020Learning to be Safe: Deep RL with a Safety Criticcited by 116
10 more
  1. 2020Learning to Walk in the Real World with Minimal Human Effortcited by 111
  2. 2018Composable Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotic Manipulationcited by 72
  3. 2018Accelerated Primal-Dual Policy Optimization for Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 62
  4. 2017Hybrid Reward Architecture for Reinforcement Learningcited by 58
  5. 2021Scalar reward is not enough: A response to Silver, Singh, Precup and Sutton (2021)cited by 55
  6. 2018Urban Driving with Multi-Objective Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 30
  7. 2018A Multi-Objective Deep Reinforcement Learning Frameworkcited by 23
  8. 2022Lexicographic Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
  9. 2018VPE: Variational Policy Embedding for Transfer Reinforcement Learningcited by 8
  10. 2017Multi-Advisor Reinforcement Learningcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

5 papers.