Uncertainty Quantification in Inverse Models in Hydrology
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In hydrology, modeling streamflow remains a challenging task due to the limited availability of basin characteristics information such as soil geology and geomorphology. These characteristics may be noisy due to measurement errors or may be missing altogether. To overcome this challenge, we propose a knowledge-guided, probabilistic inverse modeling method for recovering physical characteristics from streamflow and weather data, which are more readily available. We compare our framework with state-of-the-art inverse models for estimating river basin characteristics. We also show that these estimates offer improvement in streamflow modeling as opposed to using the original basin characteristic values. Our inverse model offers 3% improvement in R2 for the inverse model (basin characteristic estimation) and 6% for the forward model (streamflow prediction). Our framework also offers improved explainability since it can quantify uncertainty in both the inverse and the forward model. Uncertainty quantification plays a pivotal role in improving the explainability of machine learning models by providing additional insights into the reliability and limitations of model predictions. In our analysis, we assess the quality of the uncertainty estimates. Compared to baseline uncertainty quantification methods, our framework offers 10% improvement in the dispersion of epistemic uncertainty and 13% improvement in coverage rate. This information can help stakeholders understand the level of uncertainty associated with the predictions and provide a more comprehensive view of the potential outcomes.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2023.
Builds on
16 of 38 references.
References · 16
- 2015Variational Dropout and the Local Reparameterization Trickcited by 489
- 2017Concrete Dropoutcited by 227
- 2013Maxout Networkscited by 186
- 2022Uncertainty Quantification in Scientific Machine Learning: Methods, Metrics, and Comparisonscited by 169
- 2018Flipout: Efficient Pseudo-Independent Weight Perturbations on Mini-Batchescited by 133
- 2019Invertible generative models for inverse problems: mitigating representation error and dataset biascited by 93
- 2019Towards Learning Universal, Regional, and Local Hydrological Behaviors via Machine-Learning Applied to Large-Sample Datasetscited by 68
- 2021Simulation Intelligence: Towards a New Generation of Scientific Methodscited by 68
- 2020Deep Probabilistic Imaging: Uncertainty Quantification and Multi-modal Solution Characterization for Computational Imagingcited by 57
- 2020Robustness of Bayesian Neural Networks to Gradient-Based Attackscited by 48
- 2019Statistical Guarantees for the Robustness of Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 35
- 2020Solving Inverse Problems with a Flow-based Noise Modelcited by 31
4 more
- 2017Fine-grained Recognition in the Wild: A Multi-Task Domain Adaptation Approachcited by 27
- 2021PID-GAN: A GAN Framework based on a Physics-informed Discriminator for Uncertainty Quantification with Physicscited by 21
- 2021Robust Inverse Framework using Knowledge-guided Self-Supervised Learning: An application to Hydrologycited by 15
- 2022Probabilistic Inverse Modeling: An Application in Hydrologycited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.