Don't Miss Out on Novelty: Importance of Novel Features for Deep Anomaly Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Anomaly Detection (AD) is a critical task that involves identifying observations that do not conform to a learned model of normality. Prior work in deep AD is predominantly based on a familiarity hypothesis, where familiar features serve as the reference in a pre-trained embedding space. While this strategy has proven highly successful, it turns out that it causes consistent false negatives when anomalies consist of truly novel features that are not well captured by the pre-trained encoding. We propose a novel approach to AD using explainability to capture such novel features as unexplained observations in the input space. We achieve strong performance across a wide range of anomaly benchmarks by combining familiarity and novelty in a hybrid approach. Our approach establishes a new state-of-the-art across multiple benchmarks, handling diverse anomaly types while eliminating the need for expensive background models and dense matching. In particular, we show that by taking account of novel features, we reduce false negative anomalies by up to 40% on challenging benchmarks compared to the state-of-the-art. Our method gives visually inspectable explanations for pixel-level anomalies.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2023.
Builds on
28 of 37 references.
References · 28
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
- 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 942
- 2021Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detectioncited by 776
- 2019Using Self-Supervised Learning Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 514
- 2020CSI: Novelty Detection via Contrastive Learning on Distributionally Shifted Instancescited by 441
- 2019Uninformed Students: Student-Teacher Anomaly Detection with Discriminative Latent Embeddingscited by 386
- 2021Open-Set Recognition: a Good Closed-Set Classifier is All You Need?cited by 353
- 2023Synthetic Data from Diffusion Models Improves ImageNet Classificationcited by 327
- 2020Sub-Image Anomaly Detection with Deep Pyramid Correspondencescited by 300
- 2020Multiresolution Knowledge Distillation for Anomaly Detectioncited by 285
- 2021Exploring the Limits of Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 283
- 2022ADBench: Anomaly Detection Benchmarkcited by 232
16 more
- 2023An Overview of Catastrophic AI Riskscited by 222
- 2022Fake it till you make it: Learning transferable representations from synthetic ImageNet clonescited by 172
- 2021OpenGAN: Open-Set Recognition via Open Data Generationcited by 135
- 2020Deep Learning for Medical Anomaly Detection -- A Surveycited by 127
- 2020Deep Nearest Neighbor Anomaly Detectioncited by 104
- 2021Mean-Shifted Contrastive Loss for Anomaly Detectioncited by 88
- 2022B-cos Networks: Alignment is All We Need for Interpretabilitycited by 88
- 2018Learning Deep Features for One-Class Classificationcited by 76
- 2018Excessive Invariance Causes Adversarial Vulnerabilitycited by 66
- 2019Deep Unknown Intent Detection with Margin Losscited by 66
- 2020G2D: Generate to Detect Anomalycited by 42
- 2022DenseHybrid: Hybrid Anomaly Detection for Dense Open-set Recognitioncited by 42
- 2022The Familiarity Hypothesis: Explaining the Behavior of Deep Open Set Methodscited by 28
- 2021Transformaly -- Two (Feature Spaces) Are Better Than Onecited by 25
- 2022A Survey of Visual Sensory Anomaly Detectioncited by 11
- 2023No Free Lunch: The Hazards of Over-Expressive Representations in Anomaly Detectioncited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.