Nine-year-old children outperformed ChatGPT in emotion: Evidence from Chinese writing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
ChatGPT has been demonstrated to possess significant capabilities in generating intricate, human-like text, and recent studies have established that its performance in theory of mind tasks is comparable to that of a nine-year-old child. However, it remains uncertain whether ChatGPT surpasses nine-year-old children in Chinese writing proficiency. To explore this, our study juxtaposed the Chinese writing performance of ChatGPT and nine-year-old children on both narrative and scientific topics, aiming to uncover the relative strengths and weaknesses of ChatGPT in writing. The collected data were analyzed across five linguistic dimensions: fluency, accuracy, complexity, cohesion, and emotion. Each dimension underwent assessment through precise indices. The findings revealed that nine-year-old children excelled beyond ChatGPT in terms of fluency and cohesion within their writing. In contrast, ChatGPT manifested a superior performance in accuracy compared to the children. Concerning complexity, children exhibited superior skills in science-themed writing, while ChatGPT prevailed in nature-themed writing. Significantly, this research is pioneering in revealing that nine-year-old children convey stronger emotions than ChatGPT in their Chinese compositions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2023.
Builds on
10 of 71 references.
References · 10
- 2021W2v-BERT: Combining Contrastive Learning and Masked Language Modeling for Self-Supervised Speech Pre-Trainingcited by 347
- 2023Is ChatGPT A Good Translator? Yes With GPT-4 As The Enginecited by 176
- 2023Towards Making the Most of ChatGPT for Machine Translationcited by 138
- 2023Error Analysis Prompting Enables Human-Like Translation Evaluation in Large Language Modelscited by 87
- 2023Is ChatGPT Equipped with Emotional Dialogue Capabilities?cited by 54
- 2022DiscoScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT and Discourse Coherencecited by 36
- 2023Chatting Makes Perfect: Chat-based Image Retrievalcited by 25
- 2023Let's have a chat! A Conversation with ChatGPT: Technology, Applications, and Limitationscited by 16
- 2023Does Conceptual Representation Require Embodiment? Insights From Large Language Modelscited by 5
- 2023Chinese Intermediate English Learners outdid ChatGPT in deep cohesion: Evidence from English narrative writingcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.