mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Out-Of-Domain Unlabeled Data Improves Generalization

arXiv 2310.00027 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2023stat.ML cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a novel framework for incorporating unlabeled data into semi-supervised classification problems, where scenarios involving the minimization of either i) adversarially robust or ii) non-robust loss functions have been considered. Notably, we allow the unlabeled samples to deviate slightly (in total variation sense) from the in-domain distribution. The core idea behind our framework is to combine Distributionally Robust Optimization (DRO) with self-supervised training. As a result, we also leverage efficient polynomial-time algorithms for the training stage. From a theoretical standpoint, we apply our framework on the classification problem of a mixture of two Gaussians in ℝd, where in addition to the m independent and labeled samples from the true distribution, a set of n (usually with ngg m) out of domain and unlabeled samples are given as well. Using only the labeled data, it is known that the generalization error can be bounded by proptoleft(d/mright)1/2. However, using our method on both isotropic and non-isotropic Gaussian mixture models, one can derive a new set of analytically explicit and non-asymptotic bounds which show substantial improvement on the generalization error compared to ERM. Our results underscore two significant insights: 1) out-of-domain samples, even when unlabeled, can be harnessed to narrow the generalization gap, provided that the true data distribution adheres to a form of the ``cluster assumption", and 2) the semi-supervised learning paradigm can be regarded as a special case of our framework when there are no distributional shifts. We validate our claims through experiments conducted on a variety of synthetic and real-world datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2023.

Builds on

34 of 52 references.

References · 34

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  4. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
  5. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
  6. 2017Virtual Adversarial Training: A Regularization Method for Supervised and Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 920
  7. 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 776
  8. 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 416
  9. 2017Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learningcited by 414
  10. 2017Certifying Some Distributional Robustness with Principled Adversarial Trainingcited by 337
  11. 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
  12. 2015Data-driven Distributionally Robust Optimization Using the Wasserstein Metric: Performance Guarantees and Tractable Reformulationscited by 291
22 more
  1. 2019Are Labels Required for Improving Adversarial Robustness?cited by 163
  2. 2016Variance-based regularization with convex objectivescited by 155
  3. 2020Understanding Self-Training for Gradual Domain Adaptationcited by 149
  4. 2015Distributionally Robust Logistic Regressioncited by 126
  5. 2020Domain Adaptation with Conditional Distribution Matching and Generalized Label Shiftcited by 125
  6. 2016Theoretical Analysis of Domain Adaptation with Optimal Transportcited by 105
  7. 2019Adversarially Robust Generalization Just Requires More Unlabeled Datacited by 76
  8. 2022Self-Supervised Vision Transformers Learn Visual Concepts in Histopathologycited by 50
  9. 2019Robustness to Adversarial Perturbations in Learning from Incomplete Datacited by 49
  10. 2020Finite-Sample Guarantees for Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Optimization: Breaking the Curse of Dimensionalitycited by 49
  11. 2019On Learning Invariant Representation for Domain Adaptationcited by 39
  12. 2015A New PAC-Bayesian Perspective on Domain Adaptationcited by 29
  13. 2020Improving Adversarial Robustness via Unlabeled Out-of-Domain Datacited by 23
  14. 2021Removing Undesirable Feature Contributions Using Out-of-Distribution Datacited by 23
  15. 2019Incorporating Unlabeled Data into Distributionally Robust Learningcited by 20
  16. 2017PAC-Bayes and Domain Adaptationcited by 16
  17. 2021On Learning Domain-Invariant Representations for Transfer Learning with Multiple Sourcescited by 15
  18. 2022Information-Theoretic Analysis of Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 15
  19. 2022PAC-Bayesian Domain Adaptation Bounds for Multiclass Learnerscited by 13
  20. 2017Semi-supervised Learning based on Distributionally Robust Optimizationcited by 12
  21. 2022The Value of Out-of-Distribution Datacited by 12
  22. 2021Understanding the Limits of Unsupervised Domain Adaptation via Data Poisoningcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.