mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FORB: A Flat Object Retrieval Benchmark for Universal Image Embedding

arXiv 2309.16249 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2023cs.CVcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Image retrieval is a fundamental task in computer vision. Despite recent advances in this field, many techniques have been evaluated on a limited number of domains, with a small number of instance categories. Notably, most existing works only consider domains like 3D landmarks, making it difficult to generalize the conclusions made by these works to other domains, e.g., logo and other 2D flat objects. To bridge this gap, we introduce a new dataset for benchmarking visual search methods on flat images with diverse patterns. Our flat object retrieval benchmark (FORB) supplements the commonly adopted 3D object domain, and more importantly, it serves as a testbed for assessing the image embedding quality on out-of-distribution domains. In this benchmark we investigate the retrieval accuracy of representative methods in terms of candidate ranks, as well as matching score margin, a viewpoint which is largely ignored by many works. Our experiments not only highlight the challenges and rich heterogeneity of FORB, but also reveal the hidden properties of different retrieval strategies. The proposed benchmark is a growing project and we expect to expand in both quantity and variety of objects. The dataset and supporting codes are available at https://github.com/pxiangwu/FORB/.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2023.

Builds on

28 of 49 references.

References · 28

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  5. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  6. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  7. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  8. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  9. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  10. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,069
  11. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
  12. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
16 more
  1. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
  2. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,131
  3. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  4. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,853
  5. 2017Fine-tuning CNN Image Retrieval with No Human Annotationcited by 497
  6. 2015Deep Metric Learning via Lifted Structured Feature Embeddingcited by 449
  7. 2021SLIP: Self-supervision meets Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 434
  8. 2020Google Landmarks Dataset v2 -- A Large-Scale Benchmark for Instance-Level Recognition and Retrievalcited by 305
  9. 2016Large-Scale Image Retrieval with Attentive Deep Local Featurescited by 238
  10. 2018Revisiting Oxford and Paris: Large-Scale Image Retrieval Benchmarkingcited by 189
  11. 2016Deep Image Retrieval: Learning global representations for image searchcited by 147
  12. 2023Filtering, Distillation, and Hard Negatives for Vision-Language Pre-Trainingcited by 91
  13. 2015Aggregating Deep Convolutional Features for Image Retrievalcited by 63
  14. 2023Unicom: Universal and Compact Representation Learning for Image Retrievalcited by 36
  15. 2022Learning Super-Features for Image Retrievalcited by 35
  16. 2017Open Set Logo Detection and Retrievalcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

9 papers.