Large Language Model Soft Ideologization via AI-Self-Consciousness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated human-level performance on a vast spectrum of natural language tasks. However, few studies have addressed the LLM threat and vulnerability from an ideology perspective, especially when they are increasingly being deployed in sensitive domains, e.g., elections and education. In this study, we explore the implications of GPT soft ideologization through the use of AI-self-consciousness. By utilizing GPT self-conversations, AI can be granted a vision to "comprehend" the intended ideology, and subsequently generate finetuning data for LLM ideology injection. When compared to traditional government ideology manipulation techniques, such as information censorship, LLM ideologization proves advantageous; it is easy to implement, cost-effective, and powerful, thus brimming with risks.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2023.
Builds on
5 of 20 references.
References · 5
- 2023The political ideology of conversational AI: Converging evidence on ChatGPT's pro-environmental, left-libertarian orientationcited by 183
- 2023The Self-Perception and Political Biases of ChatGPTcited by 66
- 2022GPT Takes the Bar Examcited by 65
- 2023SentimentGPT: Exploiting GPT for Advanced Sentiment Analysis and its Departure from Current Machine Learningcited by 38
- 2023She Elicits Requirements and He Tests: Software Engineering Gender Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.