mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Devil is in the Details: A Deep Dive into the Rabbit Hole of Data Filtering

arXiv 2309.15954 ↗First posted 27 Sep 2023cs.CV cs.LGcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The quality of pre-training data plays a critical role in the performance of foundation models. Popular foundation models often design their own recipe for data filtering, which makes it hard to analyze and compare different data filtering approaches. DataComp is a new benchmark dedicated to evaluating different methods for data filtering. This paper describes our learning and solution when participating in the DataComp challenge. Our filtering strategy includes three stages: single-modality filtering, cross-modality filtering, and data distribution alignment. We integrate existing methods and propose new solutions, such as computing CLIP score on horizontally flipped images to mitigate the interference of scene text, using vision and language models to retrieve training samples for target downstream tasks, rebalancing the data distribution to improve the efficiency of allocating the computational budget, etc. We slice and dice our design choices, provide in-depth analysis, and discuss open questions. Our approach outperforms the best method from the DataComp paper by over 4% on the average performance of 38 tasks and by over 2% on ImageNet.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2023.

Builds on

25 of 34 references.

References · 25

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  4. 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,386
  5. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
  6. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
  7. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
  8. 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,497
  9. 2021LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairscited by 1,555
  10. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
  11. 2021Conceptual 12M: Pushing Web-Scale Image-Text Pre-Training To Recognize Long-Tail Visual Conceptscited by 1,216
  12. 2021Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gophercited by 1,202
13 more
  1. 2016Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classificationcited by 876
  2. 2023EVA-CLIP: Improved Training Techniques for CLIP at Scalecited by 798
  3. 2023DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasetscited by 644
  4. 2019A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmarkcited by 425
  5. 2021Supervision Exists Everywhere: A Data Efficient Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training Paradigmcited by 405
  6. 2023Data Selection for Language Models via Importance Resamplingcited by 329
  7. 2023SemDeDup: Data-efficient learning at web-scale through semantic deduplicationcited by 303
  8. 2022Quality Not Quantity: On the Interaction between Dataset Design and Robustness of CLIPcited by 97
  9. 2023Filtering, Distillation, and Hard Negatives for Vision-Language Pre-Trainingcited by 91
  10. 2023On the De-duplication of LAION-2Bcited by 47
  11. 2023T-MARS: Improving Visual Representations by Circumventing Text Feature Learningcited by 43
  12. 2022Is a Caption Worth a Thousand Images? A Controlled Study for Representation Learningcited by 39
  13. 2023Less is More: Removing Text-regions Improves CLIP Training Efficiency and Robustnesscited by 19

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 11; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

19 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Rephrasing the Web: A Recipe for Compute and Data-Efficient Language Modelingcited by 161
  2. 2024Scaling Laws for Data Filtering -- Data Curation cannot be Compute Agnosticcited by 77
  3. 2024ViTamin: Designing Scalable Vision Models in the Vision-Language Eracited by 39
  4. 2023Sieve: Multimodal Dataset Pruning Using Image Captioning Modelscited by 33
  5. 2024Finetuned Multimodal Language Models Are High-Quality Image-Text Data Filterscited by 25
  6. 2024CLIPLoss and Norm-Based Data Selection Methods for Multimodal Contrastive Learningcited by 20
  7. 2024Data-Efficient Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining: Prioritizing Data Quality over Quantitycited by 19
  8. 2024Active Data Curation Effectively Distills Large-Scale Multimodal Modelscited by 19
  9. 2024HYPE: Hyperbolic Entailment Filtering for Underspecified Images and Textscited by 17
  10. 2024The Synergy between Data and Multi-Modal Large Language Models: A Survey from Co-Development Perspectivecited by 15
  11. 2024Multimodal Misinformation Detection by Learning from Synthetic Data with Multimodal LLMscited by 13
  12. 2025Open-Qwen2VL: Compute-Efficient Pre-Training of Fully-Open Multimodal LLMs on Academic Resourcescited by 10
7 more
  1. 2025Quality over Quantity: Boosting Data Efficiency Through Ensembled Multimodal Data Curationcited by 5
  2. 2025COLLAGE: Adaptive Fusion-based Retrieval for Augmented Policy Learningcited by 5
  3. 2025Multiplicity is an Inevitable and Inherent Challenge in Multimodal Learningcited by 4
  4. 2025Filter Like You Test: Data-Driven Data Filtering for CLIP Pretrainingcited by 3
  5. 2024Beyond Filtering: Adaptive Image-Text Quality Enhancement for MLLM Pretrainingcited by 2
  6. 2026TADS: Task-Aware Data Selection for Multi-Task Multimodal Pre-Trainingcited by 0
  7. 2026Data Selection Through Iterative Self-Filtering for Vision-Language Settingscited by 0