Efficient Exact Subgraph Matching via GNN-based Path Dominance Embedding (Technical Report)
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The classic problem of exact subgraph matching returns those subgraphs in a large-scale data graph that are isomorphic to a given query graph, which has gained increasing importance in many real-world applications. In this paper, we propose a novel and effective graph neural network (GNN)-based path embedding framework (GNN-PE), which allows efficient exact subgraph matching without introducing false dismissals. Unlike traditional GNN-based graph embeddings that only produce approximate subgraph matching results, in this paper, we carefully devise GNN-based embeddings for paths, such that: if two paths (and 1-hop neighbors of vertices on them) have the subgraph relationship, their corresponding GNN-based embedding vectors will strictly follow the dominance relationship. With such a newly designed property of path dominance embeddings, we are able to propose effective pruning strategies based on path label/dominance embeddings and guarantee no false dismissals for subgraph matching. We build multidimensional indexes over path embedding vectors, and develop an efficient subgraph matching algorithm by traversing indexes over graph partitions in parallel and applying our pruning methods. We also propose a cost-model-based query plan that obtains query paths from the query graph with low query cost. To further optimize our GNN-PE approach, we also propose a more efficient GNN-based path group embedding (GNN-PGE) technique, which performs subgraph matching over grouped path embedding vectors. We design effective pruning strategies (w.r.t. grouped path embeddings) that can significantly reduce the search space during the index traversal. Through extensive experiments, we confirm the efficiency and effectiveness of our proposed GNN-PE and GNN-PGE approaches for exact subgraph matching on both real and synthetic graph data.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2024LSEnet: Lorentz Structural Entropy Neural Network for Deep Graph Clusteringcited by 20
- 2025Graph Neural Networks for Databases: A Surveycited by 6
- 2023Permutation-Invariant Graph Partitioning:How Graph Neural Networks Capture Structural Interactions?cited by 2
- 2024DELTA: Dual Consistency Delving with Topological Uncertainty for Active Graph Domain Adaptationcited by 2
- 2026Structure Guided Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Factual Queriescited by 2
- 2025Improving Subgraph Matching by Combining Algorithms and Graph Neural Networkscited by 1
- 2026MC-RAG System: A Structure-Driven RAG System for Multi-Constraint Queriescited by 1
- 2024Graph Similarity Computation via Interpretable Neural Node Alignmentcited by 0
- 2025Neural Graph Navigation for Intelligent Subgraph Matchingcited by 0
- 2026MC-RAG System: A Structure-Driven RAG System for Multi-Constraint Queries11 Jul 2026
- 2026Structure Guided Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Factual Queries21 Apr 2026
- 2025Neural Graph Navigation for Intelligent Subgraph Matching22 Nov 2025
- 2025Improving Subgraph Matching by Combining Algorithms and Graph Neural Networks27 Jul 2025
- 2025Graph Neural Networks for Databases: A Survey18 Feb 2025
- 2024Graph Similarity Computation via Interpretable Neural Node Alignment13 Dec 2024
- 2024DELTA: Dual Consistency Delving with Topological Uncertainty for Active Graph Domain Adaptation13 Sep 2024
- 2024LSEnet: Lorentz Structural Entropy Neural Network for Deep Graph Clustering20 May 2024
- 2023Permutation-Invariant Graph Partitioning:How Graph Neural Networks Capture Structural Interactions?14 Dec 2023