mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Physics Enhanced Residual Learning (PERL) Framework for Vehicle Trajectory Prediction

arXiv 2309.15284 ↗First posted 26 Sep 2023cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In vehicle trajectory prediction, physics models and data-driven models are two predominant methodologies. However, each approach presents its own set of challenges: physics models fall short in predictability, while data-driven models lack interpretability. Addressing these identified shortcomings, this paper proposes a novel framework, the Physics-Enhanced Residual Learning (PERL) model. PERL integrates the strengths of physics-based and data-driven methods for traffic state prediction. PERL contains a physics model and a residual learning model. Its prediction is the sum of the physics model result and a predicted residual as a correction to it. It preserves the interpretability inherent to physics-based models and has reduced data requirements compared to data-driven methods. Experiments were conducted using a real-world vehicle trajectory dataset. We proposed a PERL model, with the Intelligent Driver Model (IDM) as its physics car-following model and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) as its residual learning model. We compare this PERL model with the physics car-following model, data-driven model, and other physics-informed neural network (PINN) models. The result reveals that PERL achieves better prediction with a small dataset, compared to the physics model, data-driven model, and PINN model. Second, the PERL model showed faster convergence during training, offering comparable performance with fewer training samples than the data-driven model and PINN model. Sensitivity analysis also proves comparable performance of PERL using another residual learning model and a physics car-following model.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2023.

Builds on

12 of 39 references.

References · 12

  1. 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,367
  2. 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 643
  3. 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 634
  4. 2017DESIRE: Distant Future Prediction in Dynamic Scenes with Interacting Agentscited by 310
  5. 2018Residual Policy Learningcited by 164
  6. 2018An LSTM Network for Highway Trajectory Predictioncited by 81
  7. 2018Deep Bidirectional and Unidirectional LSTM Recurrent Neural Network for Network-wide Traffic Speed Predictioncited by 61
  8. 2022STDEN: Towards Physics-Guided Neural Networks for Traffic Flow Predictioncited by 45
  9. 2020A Physics-Informed Deep Learning Paradigm for Car-Following Modelscited by 41
  10. 2019Learning Discrepancy Models From Experimental Datacited by 15
  11. 2021Short-term traffic prediction using physics-aware neural networkscited by 8
  12. 2022IDM-Follower: A Model-Informed Deep Learning Method for Long-Sequence Car-Following Trajectory Predictioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 1.

5 papers.