mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Unveiling Fairness Biases in Deep Learning-Based Brain MRI Reconstruction

arXiv 2309.14392 ↗First posted 25 Sep 2023eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning (DL) reconstruction particularly of MRI has led to improvements in image fidelity and reduction of acquisition time. In neuroimaging, DL methods can reconstruct high-quality images from undersampled data. However, it is essential to consider fairness in DL algorithms, particularly in terms of demographic characteristics. This study presents the first fairness analysis in a DL-based brain MRI reconstruction model. The model utilises the U-Net architecture for image reconstruction and explores the presence and sources of unfairness by implementing baseline Empirical Risk Minimisation (ERM) and rebalancing strategies. Model performance is evaluated using image reconstruction metrics. Our findings reveal statistically significant performance biases between the gender and age subgroups. Surprisingly, data imbalance and training discrimination are not the main sources of bias. This analysis provides insights of fairness in DL-based image reconstruction and aims to improve equity in medical AI applications.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2023.

Builds on

7 of 17 references.

References · 7

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  2. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  3. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  4. 2022MEDFAIR: Benchmarking Fairness for Medical Imagingcited by 68
  5. 2021Fairness in Cardiac MR Image Analysis: An Investigation of Bias Due to Data Imbalance in Deep Learning Based Segmentationcited by 57
  6. 2022Improving the Fairness of Chest X-ray Classifierscited by 52
  7. 2022Explaining machine learning models for age classification in human gait analysiscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

5 papers.