REPA: Client Clustering without Training and Data Labels for Improved Federated Learning in Non-IID Settings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Clustering clients into groups that exhibit relatively homogeneous data distributions represents one of the major means of improving the performance of federated learning (FL) in non-independent and identically distributed (non-IID) data settings. Yet, the applicability of current state-of-the-art approaches remains limited as these approaches cluster clients based on information, such as the evolution of local model parameters, that is only obtainable through actual on-client training. On the other hand, there is a need to make FL models available to clients who are not able to perform the training themselves, as they do not have the processing capabilities required for training, or simply want to use the model without participating in the training. Furthermore, the existing alternative approaches that avert the training still require that individual clients have a sufficient amount of labeled data upon which the clustering is based, essentially assuming that each client is a data annotator. In this paper, we present REPA, an approach to client clustering in non-IID FL settings that requires neither training nor labeled data collection. REPA uses a novel supervised autoencoder-based method to create embeddings that profile a client's underlying data-generating processes without exposing the data to the server and without requiring local training. Our experimental analysis over three different datasets demonstrates that REPA delivers state-of-the-art model performance while expanding the applicability of cluster-based FL to previously uncovered use cases.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2023.
Builds on
14 of 19 references.
References · 14
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
- 2018Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 1,099
- 2019Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Designcited by 826
- 2018LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settingscited by 780
- 2020An Efficient Framework for Clustered Federated Learningcited by 505
- 2019Clustered Federated Learning: Model-Agnostic Distributed Multi-Task Optimization under Privacy Constraintscited by 499
- 2020Federated learning with hierarchical clustering of local updates to improve training on non-IID datacited by 222
- 2021Multi-Center Federated Learning: Clients Clustering for Better Personalizationcited by 112
- 2021FedProc: Prototypical Contrastive Federated Learning on Non-IID datacited by 80
- 2019Patient Clustering Improves Efficiency of Federated Machine Learning to predict mortality and hospital stay time using distributed Electronic Medical Recordscited by 70
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.